Similarities and Differences Between Machine Learning and Human Understanding

This article explores the capabilities and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in simulating human cognition. The article first reviews the research on the process of human understanding in philosophy, especially Heidegger and Gadamer's theory of hermeneutics, explaining the cyclic structure in the process of understanding and how preconceived ideas affect our cognition. Furthermore, by comparing the basic models of machine learning with the dynamic processes of human understanding, this article reveals that despite some similarities, such as the role of preconceived notions and the process of continuous information integration, machine learning still has significant shortcomings in handling emotional intelligence, creative problem-solving, and intuitive reasoning. The article also discusses the fundamental differences between the human brain and machine algorithms, as well as their impact on the future role of AI in society. This article aims to deepen our understanding of AI technology capabilities through a philosophical perspective, emphasizing the importance of considering its cognitive limitations when further developing AI technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Education Humanities and Social Science Research
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.12.1.698.2024
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similarities and Differences Between Machine Learning and Human Understanding

Pengyu Chu
Advances in Education Humanities and Social Science Research
Neural Networks and Applications
article

Similarities and Differences Between Machine Learning and Human Understanding

Pengyu Chu
article en

Abstract

This article explores the capabilities and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in simulating human cognition. The article first reviews the research on the process of human understanding in philosophy, especially Heidegger and Gadamer's theory of hermeneutics, explaining the cyclic structure in the process of understanding and how preconceived ideas affect our cognition. Furthermore, by comparing the basic models of machine learning with the dynamic processes of human understanding, this article reveals that despite some similarities, such as the role of preconceived notions and the process of continuous information integration, machine learning still has significant shortcomings in handling emotional intelligence, creative problem-solving, and intuitive reasoning. The article also discusses the fundamental differences between the human brain and machine algorithms, as well as their impact on the future role of AI in society. This article aims to deepen our understanding of AI technology capabilities through a philosophical perspective, emphasizing the importance of considering its cognitive limitations when further developing AI technology.

Advances in Education Humanities and Social Science ResearchVol. 12(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Neural Networks and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Similarities and Differences Between Machine Learning and Human Understanding — Pengyu Chu · Advances in Education Humanities and Social Science Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS