Understanding cyclists’ perception of driverless vehicles through eye-tracking and interviews

• This study used a Wizard-of-Oz method to assess whether cyclists can detect the absence of a driver in automated vehicles. • We employed computer vision to analyse cyclists’ gaze behaviour. • Cyclists detected the absence or presence of a driver with 93% accuracy. • Cyclists prefer to be informed about the vehicle’s automated driving state. As automated vehicles (AVs) become increasingly popular, the question arises as to how cyclists will interact with such vehicles. This study investigated (1) whether cyclists spontaneously notice if a vehicle is driverless, (2) how well they perform a driver-detection task when explicitly instructed, and (3) how they carry out these tasks. Using a Wizard-of-Oz method, 37 participants cycled a designated route and encountered an AV multiple times in two experimental sessions. In Session 1, participants cycled the route uninstructed, while in Session 2, they were instructed to verbally report whether they detected the presence or absence of a driver. Additionally, we recorded participants’ gaze behaviour with eye-tracking and their responses in post-session interviews. The interviews revealed that 30% of the cyclists spontaneously mentioned the absence of a driver (Session 1), and when instructed (Session 2), they detected the absence and presence of the driver with 93% accuracy. The eye-tracking data showed that cyclists looked more frequently and for longer at the vehicle in Session 2 compared to Session 1. Additionally, participants exhibited intermittent sampling of the vehicle, and they looked at the area in front of the vehicle when it was far away and towards the windshield region when it was closer. The post-session interviews also indicated that participants were curious, but felt safe, and reported a need to receive information about the AV’s driving state. In conclusion, cyclists can detect the absence of a driver in the AV, and this detection may influence their perception of safety. Further research is needed to explore these findings in real-world traffic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.11.015
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding cyclists’ perception of driverless vehicles through eye-tracking and interviews

Dimitra Dodou, Siri Hegna Berge, Nagarjun Reddy, Joost de Winter et al.
4 citations
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.57
article

Understanding cyclists’ perception of driverless vehicles through eye-tracking and interviews

Dimitra Dodou, Siri Hegna Berge, Nagarjun Reddy, Joost de Winter, Narayana Raju, Yongqi Dong, Eleonora Papadimitriou, Haneen Farah, Amir Pooyan Afghari
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• This study used a Wizard-of-Oz method to assess whether cyclists can detect the absence of a driver in automated vehicles. • We employed computer vision to analyse cyclists’ gaze behaviour. • Cyclists detected the absence or presence of a driver with 93% accuracy. • Cyclists prefer to be informed about the vehicle’s automated driving state. As automated vehicles (AVs) become increasingly popular, the question arises as to how cyclists will interact with such vehicles. This study investigated (1) whether cyclists spontaneously notice if a vehicle is driverless, (2) how well they perform a driver-detection task when explicitly instructed, and (3) how they carry out these tasks. Using a Wizard-of-Oz method, 37 participants cycled a designated route and encountered an AV multiple times in two experimental sessions. In Session 1, participants cycled the route uninstructed, while in Session 2, they were instructed to verbally report whether they detected the presence or absence of a driver. Additionally, we recorded participants’ gaze behaviour with eye-tracking and their responses in post-session interviews. The interviews revealed that 30% of the cyclists spontaneously mentioned the absence of a driver (Session 1), and when instructed (Session 2), they detected the absence and presence of the driver with 93% accuracy. The eye-tracking data showed that cyclists looked more frequently and for longer at the vehicle in Session 2 compared to Session 1. Additionally, participants exhibited intermittent sampling of the vehicle, and they looked at the area in front of the vehicle when it was far away and towards the windshield region when it was closer. The post-session interviews also indicated that participants were curious, but felt safe, and reported a need to receive information about the AV’s driving state. In conclusion, cyclists can detect the absence of a driver in the AV, and this detection may influence their perception of safety. Further research is needed to explore these findings in real-world traffic conditions.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 109
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.