Comparative nutrachemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of commonly eaten Ficus fruits in Bangladesh

Several Ficus species showed potential antimicrobial, antidiabetic, antioxidant, wound healing, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, antidiarrheal, and hepatoprotective properties. Hence, this study examined the nutrachemical composition, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of two commonly consumed Ficus fruits (Ficus racemosa and Ficus hispida), from southeast Bangladesh, considering the growing demand for natural food supplements and preservatives. Proximate analysis revealed that F. hispida had significantly higher moisture (85.73±0.75%), crude fiber (26.53±0.15%), and inorganic content (8.87±0.10%). Conversely, F. racemosa contained higher fat (9.30±0.02%) and carbohydrate (48.57±0.13%) levels, while protein content was similar between the two species. Mineral analysis revealed that F. racemosa was rich in sodium, potassium and copper whereas F. hispida had higher calcium, magnesium, phosphorus and iron; zinc content was comparable in both species. Phytochemical screening indicated the presence of tannins and alkaloids in both fruits, though saponins were highly present in F. racemosa but absent in F. hispida. The total phenol content (mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (mg QE/g) were notably higher in F. racemosa (10.42±0.03 and 20.05±0.15, respectively) compared with F. hispida (5.74±0.06 and 15.97±0.75, respectively). Antioxidant capacity, measured by DPPH scavenging activity, was significantly stronger in F. racemosa (IC₅₀ = 16.80±1.08) than in F. hispida (IC₅₀ = 35.83±1.75). Multivariate analysis revealed a distinct separation between the two species based on principal components, highlighting F. racemosa as rich in antioxidants, while F. hispida had higher mineral content. However, extracts from both fruits showed no inhibition zones against foodborne pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. These findings suggested that Ficus fruits may serve as natural sources of essential nutrients to address malnutrition and oxidative stress-related diseases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Food Research
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.8(6).600
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative nutrachemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of commonly eaten Ficus fruits in Bangladesh

Shine Htet Aung, Mohammad Shaokat Ali, Mohammad Mozibul Haque, F. Hasan et al.
1 citations
Food Research
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
0.60
article

Comparative nutrachemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of commonly eaten Ficus fruits in Bangladesh

Shine Htet Aung, Mohammad Shaokat Ali, Mohammad Mozibul Haque, F. Hasan, Dilshad Islam, Md. Altaf Hossain, Nilufa Yeasmin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several Ficus species showed potential antimicrobial, antidiabetic, antioxidant, wound healing, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, antidiarrheal, and hepatoprotective properties. Hence, this study examined the nutrachemical composition, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activity of two commonly consumed Ficus fruits (Ficus racemosa and Ficus hispida), from southeast Bangladesh, considering the growing demand for natural food supplements and preservatives. Proximate analysis revealed that F. hispida had significantly higher moisture (85.73±0.75%), crude fiber (26.53±0.15%), and inorganic content (8.87±0.10%). Conversely, F. racemosa contained higher fat (9.30±0.02%) and carbohydrate (48.57±0.13%) levels, while protein content was similar between the two species. Mineral analysis revealed that F. racemosa was rich in sodium, potassium and copper whereas F. hispida had higher calcium, magnesium, phosphorus and iron; zinc content was comparable in both species. Phytochemical screening indicated the presence of tannins and alkaloids in both fruits, though saponins were highly present in F. racemosa but absent in F. hispida. The total phenol content (mg GAE/g) and flavonoid content (mg QE/g) were notably higher in F. racemosa (10.42±0.03 and 20.05±0.15, respectively) compared with F. hispida (5.74±0.06 and 15.97±0.75, respectively). Antioxidant capacity, measured by DPPH scavenging activity, was significantly stronger in F. racemosa (IC₅₀ = 16.80±1.08) than in F. hispida (IC₅₀ = 35.83±1.75). Multivariate analysis revealed a distinct separation between the two species based on principal components, highlighting F. racemosa as rich in antioxidants, while F. hispida had higher mineral content. However, extracts from both fruits showed no inhibition zones against foodborne pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. These findings suggested that Ficus fruits may serve as natural sources of essential nutrients to address malnutrition and oxidative stress-related diseases.

Food ResearchVol. 8(6)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.