Dog Ownership Fee and the Issue of Levy Collection, Tax Exemptions and Rate Differentiation. A Tax-Legal Analysis

Until the end of 2007, there was a dog ownership tax in the tax law system. The dog ownership tax was an obligatory benefit, i.e. municipal councils were obliged to establish and collect this tax (even if the costs of its collection exceeded the proceeds from the dog ownership tax). Consequently, there were calls for the dog ownership tax to be replaced by a tribute collected by municipalities on an optional basis. As of 1 January 2008, the dog ownership tax was replaced by a dog ownership levy. Unlike the dog ownership tax, the dog ownership fee is an optional levy – municipalities may, but are not required to, specify the obligation to pay the dog ownership fee. The municipal council is only empowered to introduce tax relief if the term relief is used in the relevant statutory provision. The power to enact tax reliefs cannot be derived from a provision authorising the municipal council to enact exemptions in local taxes and charges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9026
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dog Ownership Fee and the Issue of Levy Collection, Tax Exemptions and Rate Differentiation. A Tax-Legal Analysis

Jacek Leńczuk, Agnieszka Chmielowska-Marmucka, Tadeusz Mędzelowski, Dawid Jakimiec
Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Dog Ownership Fee and the Issue of Levy Collection, Tax Exemptions and Rate Differentiation. A Tax-Legal Analysis

Jacek Leńczuk, Agnieszka Chmielowska-Marmucka, Tadeusz Mędzelowski, Dawid Jakimiec
article en

Abstract

Until the end of 2007, there was a dog ownership tax in the tax law system. The dog ownership tax was an obligatory benefit, i.e. municipal councils were obliged to establish and collect this tax (even if the costs of its collection exceeded the proceeds from the dog ownership tax). Consequently, there were calls for the dog ownership tax to be replaced by a tribute collected by municipalities on an optional basis. As of 1 January 2008, the dog ownership tax was replaced by a dog ownership levy. Unlike the dog ownership tax, the dog ownership fee is an optional levy – municipalities may, but are not required to, specify the obligation to pay the dog ownership fee. The municipal council is only empowered to introduce tax relief if the term relief is used in the relevant statutory provision. The power to enact tax reliefs cannot be derived from a provision authorising the municipal council to enact exemptions in local taxes and charges.

Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w LublinieVol. 17(2)
University of Economics and Innovation (PL), National-Louis University (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dog Ownership Fee and the Issue of Levy Collection, Tax Exemptions and Rate Differentiation. A Tax-Legal Analysis — Jacek Leńczuk, Agnieszka Chmielowska-Marmucka, et al. · Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS