New method for extraction, identification, and quantification of non‐intentionally added substances in polystyrene

Abstract An efficient one‐step extraction method was developed for the recovery of additives and non‐intentionally added substances (NIAS) from polystyrene, performed at room temperature for 2.33 h, without grinding to avoid fostering the formation of NIAS unrelated to polymer processing. Solvent use (39.2 mL/g) was greatly reduced compared with extraction conditions previously reported. The study of NIAS is analytically challenging but with high importance since their presence is a potential threat to human health and to the environment while reducing plastic potential recyclability. For an understanding of NIAS formation and influence of processing parameters, a systematic approach was taken, using virgin polystyrene mixed with known quantities of standard additives as model materials (Irganox_1076, Tinuvin_326, Irgafos_168). The degradation of one additive was identified by NMR and GC–MS. Precise multiple‐point quantification with internal standard was performed by GC–MS, measuring a 5.1 wt% Irgafos_168 degradation, with additives LOD ranging from 0.55–0.95 ppm. Evaluation of analytical challenges, such as matrix effects, was discussed and quantified. This method will help the quality control of virgin and recycled PS materials, including food contact ones, and improve the knowledge of PS processing impact on NIAS formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.22188
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New method for extraction, identification, and quantification of non‐intentionally added substances in polystyrene

Alice Mija, Patrick Navard, Sacha Pérocheau Arnaud, Sandra Olivero et al.
3 citations
Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
0.94
article

New method for extraction, identification, and quantification of non‐intentionally added substances in polystyrene

Alice Mija, Patrick Navard, Sacha Pérocheau Arnaud, Sandra Olivero, Véronique Michelet, Christelle Combeaud
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract An efficient one‐step extraction method was developed for the recovery of additives and non‐intentionally added substances (NIAS) from polystyrene, performed at room temperature for 2.33 h, without grinding to avoid fostering the formation of NIAS unrelated to polymer processing. Solvent use (39.2 mL/g) was greatly reduced compared with extraction conditions previously reported. The study of NIAS is analytically challenging but with high importance since their presence is a potential threat to human health and to the environment while reducing plastic potential recyclability. For an understanding of NIAS formation and influence of processing parameters, a systematic approach was taken, using virgin polystyrene mixed with known quantities of standard additives as model materials (Irganox_1076, Tinuvin_326, Irgafos_168). The degradation of one additive was identified by NMR and GC–MS. Precise multiple‐point quantification with internal standard was performed by GC–MS, measuring a 5.1 wt% Irgafos_168 degradation, with additives LOD ranging from 0.55–0.95 ppm. Evaluation of analytical challenges, such as matrix effects, was discussed and quantified. This method will help the quality control of virgin and recycled PS materials, including food contact ones, and improve the knowledge of PS processing impact on NIAS formation.

Journal of Vinyl and Additive TechnologyVol. 31(3)
Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Institut de Chimie de Nice (FR), Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux (FR), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.