Universal Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention: CODE RED Initial Feasibility and Acceptability

Suicide rates have increased in the US over the last decades. Schools often deliver suicide prevention trainings and there is growing evidence that these trainings in schools are effective. The current study examined a new upstream approach, CODE RED in which trainees complete their own safety plan prior to a mental health emergency. Participants were adult school personnel (<i>n</i> = 201) who completed CODE RED trainings and were surveyed using three validated 4-item measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM), intervention appropriateness measure (IAM), and feasibility of intervention measure (FIM). Open-ended questions were analyzed using a thematic approach. Of 201 participants who completed the survey, acceptability (18.0), appropriateness (17.9) and feasibility (18.0) were high as assessed by standardized implementation measures (each out of 20). Open-ended responses further indicated a great deal of satisfaction with the training. As a first step in determining acceptability and feasibility, CODE RED was found to be highly acceptable to adult school employees who found it applicable, appealing as an intervention, and easy to use. Most staff are hopeful that it will be useful with youth as well. It will be important to determine how this activity is used by youth and if it can be used in mental health crises to decrease symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121704
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universal Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention: CODE RED Initial Feasibility and Acceptability

Elizabeth Salt, Julie Cerel, Martina Fruhbauerova, J.P. Ackerman et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Universal Safety Planning for Suicide Prevention: CODE RED Initial Feasibility and Acceptability

Elizabeth Salt, Julie Cerel, Martina Fruhbauerova, J.P. Ackerman, Alice Edwards, Leah Murphy, P. M. S. Clark, Beverly Whipple
article en

Abstract

Suicide rates have increased in the US over the last decades. Schools often deliver suicide prevention trainings and there is growing evidence that these trainings in schools are effective. The current study examined a new upstream approach, CODE RED in which trainees complete their own safety plan prior to a mental health emergency. Participants were adult school personnel (<i>n</i> = 201) who completed CODE RED trainings and were surveyed using three validated 4-item measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM), intervention appropriateness measure (IAM), and feasibility of intervention measure (FIM). Open-ended questions were analyzed using a thematic approach. Of 201 participants who completed the survey, acceptability (18.0), appropriateness (17.9) and feasibility (18.0) were high as assessed by standardized implementation measures (each out of 20). Open-ended responses further indicated a great deal of satisfaction with the training. As a first step in determining acceptability and feasibility, CODE RED was found to be highly acceptable to adult school employees who found it applicable, appealing as an intervention, and easy to use. Most staff are hopeful that it will be useful with youth as well. It will be important to determine how this activity is used by youth and if it can be used in mental health crises to decrease symptoms.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 21(12)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.