Newton’s First Law and the Grand Unification

This paper is devoted to the study of stationary trajectories of free particles. From a classical point of view, this appears to be an almost trivial problem: Free particles should follow straight lines as predicted by Newton’s first law, and straight lines are indeed the stationary trajectories of the standard action integrals in the classical theory. In the following, however, a general relativistic approach is studied, and in this situation it is much less evident what action integral should be used. As it turns out, using the traditional Einstein–Hilbert principle gives us stationary states very much in line with the classical theory. But it is suggested that a different action principle, and in fact one which is closer to quantum mechanics, gives stationary states with a much richer structure: Even if these states in a sense can represent particles which obey the first law, they are also inherently rotating. Although we may still be far from understanding how general relativity and quantum mechanics should be united, this may give an interesting clue to why rotation (or rather spin, which is a different but related concept) seems to be the natural state of motion for elementary particles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121694
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Newton’s First Law and the Grand Unification

Martin Tamm
2 citations
Symmetry
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
0.66
article

Newton’s First Law and the Grand Unification

Martin Tamm
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the study of stationary trajectories of free particles. From a classical point of view, this appears to be an almost trivial problem: Free particles should follow straight lines as predicted by Newton’s first law, and straight lines are indeed the stationary trajectories of the standard action integrals in the classical theory. In the following, however, a general relativistic approach is studied, and in this situation it is much less evident what action integral should be used. As it turns out, using the traditional Einstein–Hilbert principle gives us stationary states very much in line with the classical theory. But it is suggested that a different action principle, and in fact one which is closer to quantum mechanics, gives stationary states with a much richer structure: Even if these states in a sense can represent particles which obey the first law, they are also inherently rotating. Although we may still be far from understanding how general relativity and quantum mechanics should be united, this may give an interesting clue to why rotation (or rather spin, which is a different but related concept) seems to be the natural state of motion for elementary particles.

SymmetryVol. 16(12)
Stockholm University (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.