Healthcare Professionals' Experiences From the COVID‐19 Vaccination Program for the Homebound Population in Greece: A Cross‐Sectional Mixed‐Methods National Study

ABSTRACT During the pandemic, mobile vaccination units administered COVID‐19 shots to homebound populations. This study explores the perspectives of public healthcare providers involved in Greece's COVID‐19 home vaccination program, aiming to identify challenges and inform improvements in delivering healthcare services at home. This is a cross‐sectional mixed‐methods survey with convergent design, conducted in public Primary Health Care facilities, using a questionnaire. Facilities from all Health Districts were invited. The study population included healthcare professionals and administrative staff engaged in vaccination units. Data were collected from April to July 2022. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariate linear regression analysis, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Integration at the analysis phase enhanced understanding and reliability. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. A total of 1200 participants from 168 facilities across six Health Districts responded. The majority were nurses (34.1%) and general practitioners (24.7%). Participants unanimously praised the program's concept, aligning it with Primary Health Care and expressed readiness for future involvement, but reported time constraints. Those in larger groups found time management easier (1.68, 95% CI [1.28, 2.20], p < 0.001). Thematic analysis of 1070 text responses identified five themes, including guidance for implementation, resource availability, field challenges, professionals' skillsets, and public engagement. Collaboration with colleagues and authorities to address transportation problems proved vital for success. Understaffing and time constraints were evident. Integrating a new service into busy settings poses challenges, underscoring the need for problem‐solving and empowering healthcare personnel to address shortcomings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Medical & Health Policy
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.648
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences From the COVID‐19 Vaccination Program for the Homebound Population in Greece: A Cross‐Sectional Mixed‐Methods National Study

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Panagiota Ntenta, Michael Dandoulakis, Paschalis Evangelidis et al.
World Medical & Health Policy
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences From the COVID‐19 Vaccination Program for the Homebound Population in Greece: A Cross‐Sectional Mixed‐Methods National Study

Dimitra Iosifina Papageorgiou, Panagiota Ntenta, Michael Dandoulakis, Paschalis Evangelidis, Aristofanis Paganas, Despoina Symintiridou, Aikaterini Zgouridou, Stella Ploukou, Anastasios Giakoumis, Marilena Gialama, Magda Gavana, Martha Andreou, Doukas Zeimbekis, Ioanna Avakian, Elias Theodoropoulos, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis, Eleni Avramidou, Nikolaos Vlachopoulos, Anna‐Bettina Haidich, Nikolaos Evangelidis, Despoina Nteli, Maria Nteli, Ioannis Vitoris, Stamatia Kokkali, Theofilos Nastas, Aspasia Bapka, Zoi Tahtalidou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT During the pandemic, mobile vaccination units administered COVID‐19 shots to homebound populations. This study explores the perspectives of public healthcare providers involved in Greece's COVID‐19 home vaccination program, aiming to identify challenges and inform improvements in delivering healthcare services at home. This is a cross‐sectional mixed‐methods survey with convergent design, conducted in public Primary Health Care facilities, using a questionnaire. Facilities from all Health Districts were invited. The study population included healthcare professionals and administrative staff engaged in vaccination units. Data were collected from April to July 2022. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and univariate linear regression analysis, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Integration at the analysis phase enhanced understanding and reliability. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. A total of 1200 participants from 168 facilities across six Health Districts responded. The majority were nurses (34.1%) and general practitioners (24.7%). Participants unanimously praised the program's concept, aligning it with Primary Health Care and expressed readiness for future involvement, but reported time constraints. Those in larger groups found time management easier (1.68, 95% CI [1.28, 2.20], p < 0.001). Thematic analysis of 1070 text responses identified five themes, including guidance for implementation, resource availability, field challenges, professionals' skillsets, and public engagement. Collaboration with colleagues and authorities to address transportation problems proved vital for success. Understaffing and time constraints were evident. Integrating a new service into busy settings poses challenges, underscoring the need for problem‐solving and empowering healthcare personnel to address shortcomings.

World Medical & Health PolicyVol. 17(2)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.