Comparison of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane-to-Skin Distances at Different Lumbar Levels and Positions Under Ultrasonography

Background: This study aimed to determine the optimal lumbar level and patient position for performing the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block by evaluating the distance between the thoracolumbar interfascial plane and the skin using ultrasound guidance. Additionally, we explored the influence of body mass index (BMI) on this distance. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing upper lumbar region surgery were evaluated. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane-to-skin distance was measured at L1 and L3 levels in three po-sitions: sitting, lateral, and prone, using a high-frequency ultrasound probe. Measurements were conducted without needle insertion, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Patient demographics, including age and body mass index (BMI), were recorded and analyzed to assess their impact on these measurements. Results: The thoracolumbar interfascial plane was significantly closer to the skin at the L1 level compared to L3 across all positions (p<0.01). Among the positions, the prone position provided the closest plane-to-skin dis-tance and the clearest ultrasound image, allowing better visualization of anatomical landmarks. Conversely, the sitting position produced the poorest image quality and was the least comfortable for patients. Furthermore, a moderate positive correlation was found between BMI and the thoracolumbar plane-to-skin Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the L1 level and prone position are optimal for TLIP block application, offering clearer imaging and easier block administration. For obese patients, the prone position is particularly advantageous as it reduces the skin-to-plane distance, potentially minimizing procedural difficulty and compli-cation risks. These insights contribute to the optimization of TLIP block techniques, especially in patient popu-lations with higher BMI. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings and expand clinical appli-cations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1581667
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane-to-Skin Distances at Different Lumbar Levels and Positions Under Ultrasonography

Başak Pehlivan, Erdoğan Duran, Resul Çiçek, Veli Fahri Pehlivan
Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane-to-Skin Distances at Different Lumbar Levels and Positions Under Ultrasonography

Başak Pehlivan, Erdoğan Duran, Resul Çiçek, Veli Fahri Pehlivan
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine the optimal lumbar level and patient position for performing the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block by evaluating the distance between the thoracolumbar interfascial plane and the skin using ultrasound guidance. Additionally, we explored the influence of body mass index (BMI) on this distance. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing upper lumbar region surgery were evaluated. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane-to-skin distance was measured at L1 and L3 levels in three po-sitions: sitting, lateral, and prone, using a high-frequency ultrasound probe. Measurements were conducted without needle insertion, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Patient demographics, including age and body mass index (BMI), were recorded and analyzed to assess their impact on these measurements. Results: The thoracolumbar interfascial plane was significantly closer to the skin at the L1 level compared to L3 across all positions (p<0.01). Among the positions, the prone position provided the closest plane-to-skin dis-tance and the clearest ultrasound image, allowing better visualization of anatomical landmarks. Conversely, the sitting position produced the poorest image quality and was the least comfortable for patients. Furthermore, a moderate positive correlation was found between BMI and the thoracolumbar plane-to-skin Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the L1 level and prone position are optimal for TLIP block application, offering clearer imaging and easier block administration. For obese patients, the prone position is particularly advantageous as it reduces the skin-to-plane distance, potentially minimizing procedural difficulty and compli-cation risks. These insights contribute to the optimization of TLIP block techniques, especially in patient popu-lations with higher BMI. Further studies are recommended to confirm these findings and expand clinical appli-cations.

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi DergisiVol. 21(3)
State Hospital (GB), Harran University (TR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.