Backwater Level Computations Due to Bridge Constrictions: An Assessment of Methods

This paper explores different methods of computing backwater depth for open-channel flow, such as one- to multi-dimensional models, finite difference approaches, and artificial intelligence methods. This paper primarily focuses on one-dimensional methods and states the implication, advantages, and disadvantages, verification process, and performance of each method. This paper discusses different parameters that influence backwater and their impact. Additionally, this paper compares the discussed one-dimensional methods with each other due to their common usage of experimental and field datasets as well as their popularity in implementation. It was concluded that while the WSPRO method significantly overestimated and the Yarnell’s method underestimated the afflux value, the measured afflux values are closest to the values computed by the energy and momentum methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11120220
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydraulic flow and structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backwater Level Computations Due to Bridge Constrictions: An Assessment of Methods

Kimia Haji Amou Assar, Abdullah Gokhan Yilmaz, Soroosh Sharifi, Serter Atabay
1 citations
Hydrology
Hydraulic flow and structures
0.26
article

Backwater Level Computations Due to Bridge Constrictions: An Assessment of Methods

Kimia Haji Amou Assar, Abdullah Gokhan Yilmaz, Soroosh Sharifi, Serter Atabay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores different methods of computing backwater depth for open-channel flow, such as one- to multi-dimensional models, finite difference approaches, and artificial intelligence methods. This paper primarily focuses on one-dimensional methods and states the implication, advantages, and disadvantages, verification process, and performance of each method. This paper discusses different parameters that influence backwater and their impact. Additionally, this paper compares the discussed one-dimensional methods with each other due to their common usage of experimental and field datasets as well as their popularity in implementation. It was concluded that while the WSPRO method significantly overestimated and the Yarnell’s method underestimated the afflux value, the measured afflux values are closest to the values computed by the energy and momentum methods.

HydrologyVol. 11(12)
La Trobe University (AU), American University of Sharjah (AE), Imperial College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
American University of Sharjah
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hydraulic flow and structures
0.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.