On Lateness: The Ethics of Running Behind Schedule in General Practice

The major reasons for lateness can be classified as GP-related, patient-related, and third party-related. The major negative consequences of lateness in general practice might be classified as the potential disturbance to quality and safe care, the dissatisfaction of and inconvenience to subsequent patients, and the disruption of timely care. These negative consequences must be burdened by some party-either the patient who is related to the reason for the lateness, or other patients who are not. While a strict equality approach to managing such lateness does not consider patients' clinical needs, GPs compensating by actively 'catching up' in their clinics threatens quality and safety of care. The paper argues for minimising the negative consequences of lateness for all parties, while simultaneously promoting equity with regard to patients' clinical needs. The ethical status of each major reason for lateness in general practice is explored, and suggestions are offered for how each might be managed to minimise the negative consequences and promote equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14293
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Lateness: The Ethics of Running Behind Schedule in General Practice

Richard Armitage
3 citations
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.55
article

On Lateness: The Ethics of Running Behind Schedule in General Practice

Richard Armitage
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The major reasons for lateness can be classified as GP-related, patient-related, and third party-related. The major negative consequences of lateness in general practice might be classified as the potential disturbance to quality and safe care, the dissatisfaction of and inconvenience to subsequent patients, and the disruption of timely care. These negative consequences must be burdened by some party-either the patient who is related to the reason for the lateness, or other patients who are not. While a strict equality approach to managing such lateness does not consider patients' clinical needs, GPs compensating by actively 'catching up' in their clinics threatens quality and safety of care. The paper argues for minimising the negative consequences of lateness for all parties, while simultaneously promoting equity with regard to patients' clinical needs. The ethical status of each major reason for lateness in general practice is explored, and suggestions are offered for how each might be managed to minimise the negative consequences and promote equity.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 31(1)
University of Nottingham (GB), Nottingham City Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On Lateness: The Ethics of Running Behind Schedule in General Practice — Richard Armitage · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS