Bulgar-Tatar discussions in the context of the problem of the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars”

In the process of mass return of the Crimean Tatar people from places of deportation to their historical homeland in Crimea (1987–2000), along with the political, social, ethnocultural problems of the revival and formation of the people in new conditions, unexpected and unpredictable situations related to the self-identification of the people arose and, quite likely, will arise in the future. As you know, one of the signs of self-identification is the self-designation of the people. In the 90s of the twentieth century, the first attempts to change the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” appeared in Crimea. The situation that arose in Crimea is similar to the processes of renaming the ethnonym “Tatars” into the ethnonym “Bulgars” that took place in Tatarstan in the 80s of the twentieth century. The analysis of the discussions on renaming the ethnonym “Tatars” in Kazan and the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in Crimea demonstrated the historically formed status quo of the ethnonyms “Tatars” and “Crimean Tatars” in the mass consciousness of the two peoples and the futility of attempts to rename them.

Publication Details

Journal
Crimean Historical Review
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2024.2.69-79
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bulgar-Tatar discussions in the context of the problem of the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars”

Crimean Historical Review
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

Bulgar-Tatar discussions in the context of the problem of the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars”

article en

Abstract

In the process of mass return of the Crimean Tatar people from places of deportation to their historical homeland in Crimea (1987–2000), along with the political, social, ethnocultural problems of the revival and formation of the people in new conditions, unexpected and unpredictable situations related to the self-identification of the people arose and, quite likely, will arise in the future. As you know, one of the signs of self-identification is the self-designation of the people. In the 90s of the twentieth century, the first attempts to change the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” appeared in Crimea. The situation that arose in Crimea is similar to the processes of renaming the ethnonym “Tatars” into the ethnonym “Bulgars” that took place in Tatarstan in the 80s of the twentieth century. The analysis of the discussions on renaming the ethnonym “Tatars” in Kazan and the ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in Crimea demonstrated the historically formed status quo of the ethnonyms “Tatars” and “Crimean Tatars” in the mass consciousness of the two peoples and the futility of attempts to rename them.

Crimean Historical ReviewVol. 11(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.