Ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in documents of international organizations

Over the past few decades a group of Crimean Tatar intellectuals have been imposing on public opinion the discussion that the self-name of the people “Crimean Tatars” allegedly does not reflect reality, it is “invented” and does not meet their cultural, public and national interests. From their point of view, there is a misunderstanding of the very word combination “Crimean Tatars” by the public, science and international organizations abroad, which creates confusion and “identifies” the indigenous people of Crimea with other peoples. From the point of view of the proponents of this concept, the adequate names are “Crimeans”, “Krymly”, “Crimeans”. At the same time, they claim that the word “Crimeans” synonymous with “Crimeans” is allegedly absolutely not close to it in meaning and cannot be mixed in any form of speech and in different languages. The author has analyzed the public documentation of the following international institutions: the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe (CoE), the European Union (EU), UNESCO for the presence in them of the mentioned words, both in the accepted translation into the languages of these organizations and in the Latin transcription of the words “Crimeans” and “Crimeans” in these languages (in order to avoid reproaches that the proposed words should be used not in their translation, but in their literal form). Acquaintance with and recording of the number of uses of the centuries-old self-designation of the people, Crimean Tatars, in comparison with the proposed or assumed words “Krymtsy”, “Krym”, “Krymly” (including in the international Latin transcription Kyrymly) shows with full clarity that the self-designation “Crimean Tatars” in the official languages of the most important and influential organizations is widespread, understandable and accepted in official documents, while the expressions “Krymly” and “Krymly” are either absolutely absent or refer to completely different phenomena. The very attempt of renaming is an unfriendly action against the Crimean Tatar people.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Crimean Historical Review
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22378/kio.2024.2.58-68
Primary Topic
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in documents of international organizations

Nadir V. Bekirov
Crimean Historical Review
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
article

Ethnonym “Crimean Tatars” in documents of international organizations

Nadir V. Bekirov
article en

Abstract

Over the past few decades a group of Crimean Tatar intellectuals have been imposing on public opinion the discussion that the self-name of the people “Crimean Tatars” allegedly does not reflect reality, it is “invented” and does not meet their cultural, public and national interests. From their point of view, there is a misunderstanding of the very word combination “Crimean Tatars” by the public, science and international organizations abroad, which creates confusion and “identifies” the indigenous people of Crimea with other peoples. From the point of view of the proponents of this concept, the adequate names are “Crimeans”, “Krymly”, “Crimeans”. At the same time, they claim that the word “Crimeans” synonymous with “Crimeans” is allegedly absolutely not close to it in meaning and cannot be mixed in any form of speech and in different languages. The author has analyzed the public documentation of the following international institutions: the United Nations (UN), the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe (CoE), the European Union (EU), UNESCO for the presence in them of the mentioned words, both in the accepted translation into the languages of these organizations and in the Latin transcription of the words “Crimeans” and “Crimeans” in these languages (in order to avoid reproaches that the proposed words should be used not in their translation, but in their literal form). Acquaintance with and recording of the number of uses of the centuries-old self-designation of the people, Crimean Tatars, in comparison with the proposed or assumed words “Krymtsy”, “Krym”, “Krymly” (including in the international Latin transcription Kyrymly) shows with full clarity that the self-designation “Crimean Tatars” in the official languages of the most important and influential organizations is widespread, understandable and accepted in official documents, while the expressions “Krymly” and “Krymly” are either absolutely absent or refer to completely different phenomena. The very attempt of renaming is an unfriendly action against the Crimean Tatar people.

Crimean Historical ReviewVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.