Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante

Scientific evidence has become an important element in modern criminal justice, especially in complex cases such as Raden Adante, where alibis are used as the main defense strategy to undermine forensic evidence. In this case, scientific methods such as DNA analysis, digital traces, and toxicology examination succeeded in breaking the defendant's alibi. This research examines how scientific evidence can overcome the challenges of alibi strategies which are often used to confuse the investigative process. This study shows that accurate and standardized forensic evidence is able to objectively confirm the presence of the defendant at the scene of the crime, thereby strengthening fair and effective law enforcement efforts. The research uses a juridical-normative approach with qualitative analysis, examining regulations, legal doctrine, and expert views to assess the role of scientific evidence in dealing with alibi defenses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jembatan Hukum
Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.955
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante

Arinto Nugroho, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante

Arinto Nugroho, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
article en

Abstract

Scientific evidence has become an important element in modern criminal justice, especially in complex cases such as Raden Adante, where alibis are used as the main defense strategy to undermine forensic evidence. In this case, scientific methods such as DNA analysis, digital traces, and toxicology examination succeeded in breaking the defendant's alibi. This research examines how scientific evidence can overcome the challenges of alibi strategies which are often used to confuse the investigative process. This study shows that accurate and standardized forensic evidence is able to objectively confirm the presence of the defendant at the scene of the crime, thereby strengthening fair and effective law enforcement efforts. The research uses a juridical-normative approach with qualitative analysis, examining regulations, legal doctrine, and expert views to assess the role of scientific evidence in dealing with alibi defenses.

Jembatan HukumVol. 1(4)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante — Arinto Nugroho, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar · Jembatan Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS