The Political Ontology of Enlightenment Materialism: Flat Ontology or Radical Anthropology?

What is the politics of Enlightenment materialism? Or, less ambiguously put, what politics does early modern materialism yield? After examining some misconceptions, including older ideas about the necessary link between materialism and the (French) Revolution, I discuss what one might call the implicit politics of ontology in some examples of thoroughgoing ‘materialist political ontology’. Consideration is given to specific cases, like those of Meslier and Diderot, which articulate an argument for a ‘democracy of matter itself’, according to which, if we are all made of the same matter, there can be no divine right of kings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19195/prt.2024.3.5
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Ontology of Enlightenment Materialism: Flat Ontology or Radical Anthropology?

Charles T. Wolfe
Praktyka Teoretyczna
Historical and Literary Studies
article

The Political Ontology of Enlightenment Materialism: Flat Ontology or Radical Anthropology?

Charles T. Wolfe
article en

Abstract

What is the politics of Enlightenment materialism? Or, less ambiguously put, what politics does early modern materialism yield? After examining some misconceptions, including older ideas about the necessary link between materialism and the (French) Revolution, I discuss what one might call the implicit politics of ontology in some examples of thoroughgoing ‘materialist political ontology’. Consideration is given to specific cases, like those of Meslier and Diderot, which articulate an argument for a ‘democracy of matter itself’, according to which, if we are all made of the same matter, there can be no divine right of kings.

Praktyka Teoretyczna(3(53))
University of Oxford, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.