Evaluation of a surrogate virus neutralization assay for detecting neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in an African population

The global resurgence of coronaviruses and the move to incorporate COVID-19 vaccines into the expanded program for immunization have warranted for a high-throughput and low-cost assay to measure and quantify mounted neutralizing antibodies as an indicator for protection against SARS-CoV-2. Hence, we evaluated the surrogate-virus-neutralization-assay (sVNT) as an alternative assay to the pseudo-virus neutralization assay (pVNT). The sVNT was used to measure neutralizing antibodies among 119 infected and/or vaccinated blood samples, against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (WT) and the Omicron-variant with reference to the pVNT. Four different cut-offs were assessed for suitability in distinguishing neutralizers: the manufacturer (>30%), literature-based (>50%) and (>80%), and population-based (>27.69%). The obtained data was analyzed using "R" through its integrated development environments; JAMOV and R-Studio. Using the WT strain, only the population-based cut-off was able to differentiate neutralizers from non-neutralizers beyond chance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.833 (95%CI, 0.505-1.0; <i>P</i> = .049). Applying the population-based cut-off, improved the sensitivity to 100% from 91.4% obtained from the manufacturer cut-off (<i>P</i> = .002). However, the specificity remained low (67%). The negative-predictive-value also improved to 100% vs 16.4% (<i>P</i> = .006), but there was no difference in the positive-predictive-value (99.1% vs 99.1%) (<i>P</i> = .340). When we used the Omicron-variant, the sVNT titers were not able to predict the neutralizers and non-neutralizers with reference to pVNT (AUC of 0.649) (<i>P</i> = .221). The sVNT assay is a potential alternative for screening individuals harboring potent neutralizing antibody with high sensitivity, although we recommend continuous improvement of the assay in line with the viral mutations. Further, we recommend that individual users establish a population-based cut-off while using the sVNT assay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Methods and Protocols
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae095
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a surrogate virus neutralization assay for detecting neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in an African population

Salim Masoud, Emmanuel Balandya, Mbazi Senkoro, Sayoki Mfinanga et al.
Biology Methods and Protocols
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Evaluation of a surrogate virus neutralization assay for detecting neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in an African population

Salim Masoud, Emmanuel Balandya, Mbazi Senkoro, Sayoki Mfinanga, Isaac Ngare, Frank E. Hassan, Lilian Nkinda, Godfrey Barabona, Elisha Osati, Emmanuel James Nkuwi, Frank Msafiri, Takamasa Ueno, Benson R. Kidenya, Doreen Kamori, Ponsian P. Kunambi, Juma Kisuse, Eligius Lyamuya, Victoria Shayo
article en

Abstract

The global resurgence of coronaviruses and the move to incorporate COVID-19 vaccines into the expanded program for immunization have warranted for a high-throughput and low-cost assay to measure and quantify mounted neutralizing antibodies as an indicator for protection against SARS-CoV-2. Hence, we evaluated the surrogate-virus-neutralization-assay (sVNT) as an alternative assay to the pseudo-virus neutralization assay (pVNT). The sVNT was used to measure neutralizing antibodies among 119 infected and/or vaccinated blood samples, against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 (WT) and the Omicron-variant with reference to the pVNT. Four different cut-offs were assessed for suitability in distinguishing neutralizers: the manufacturer (>30%), literature-based (>50%) and (>80%), and population-based (>27.69%). The obtained data was analyzed using "R" through its integrated development environments; JAMOV and R-Studio. Using the WT strain, only the population-based cut-off was able to differentiate neutralizers from non-neutralizers beyond chance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.833 (95%CI, 0.505-1.0; <i>P</i> = .049). Applying the population-based cut-off, improved the sensitivity to 100% from 91.4% obtained from the manufacturer cut-off (<i>P</i> = .002). However, the specificity remained low (67%). The negative-predictive-value also improved to 100% vs 16.4% (<i>P</i> = .006), but there was no difference in the positive-predictive-value (99.1% vs 99.1%) (<i>P</i> = .340). When we used the Omicron-variant, the sVNT titers were not able to predict the neutralizers and non-neutralizers with reference to pVNT (AUC of 0.649) (<i>P</i> = .221). The sVNT assay is a potential alternative for screening individuals harboring potent neutralizing antibody with high sensitivity, although we recommend continuous improvement of the assay in line with the viral mutations. Further, we recommend that individual users establish a population-based cut-off while using the sVNT assay.

Biology Methods and ProtocolsVol. 10(1)
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (TZ), The University of Dodoma (TZ), Kampala International University in Tanzania (TZ), Management and Development for Health (TZ), Muhimbili National Hospital (TZ), Kumamoto University (JP)
Government of the United Kingdom, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Good health and well-being, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.