The Co-Occurrence of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Provocation and State Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults with Concussion

Vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety are both independently linked to poor recovery outcomes following concussion. However, the relationship between these two clinical presentations and their co-occurring effects on concussion recovery outcomes is understudied. The purpose was to examine the co-occurring effects of vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety following concussion. There were 532 participants (15-25 years) with concussions who completed the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale within 30 days of injury. Participants were classified into provocation (PROV) and no provocation (NO PROV) groups based on exceeding/not exceeding VOMS cutoffs. An analysis of covariance was used to examine between-group comparisons on state anxiety scores; and logistic regressions, with adjusted odds ratios (Adj OR), were used to evaluate predictors of clinical levels of state anxiety and protracted recovery. A total of 418 participants (78.6%; age = 17.2 ± 2.6; 65% female) exceeding VOMS cutoffs were in the PROV, and 114 (21.4%; age = 16.6 ± 2.2; 53% female) participants were in the NO PROV group. The PROV group (mean [<i>M</i>] <i>=</i> 39.50, standard deviation [<i>SD</i>] <i>=</i> 12.05) exhibited significantly higher state anxiety scores than the NO PROV group (<i>M =</i> 32.45, <i>SD =</i> 10.43) (<i>F</i>[1, 532] = 15.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Vestibular/ocular motor provocation (Adj OR = 3.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-3.88) was the most robust predictor of clinical state anxiety following concussion (χ<sup>2</sup> [4, 532] = 86.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants exhibiting vestibular/ocular motor provocation with clinical levels of state anxiety were at 2.47 times (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.53-3.99) greater odds of experiencing a protracted concussion recovery than participants with vestibular/ocular motor provocation without clinical state anxiety. Vestibular/ocular motor provocation is associated with increased state anxiety following concussion, and the addition of clinical state anxiety to vestibular/ocular motor provocation increases the odds for protracted recovery. Clinicians should assess vestibular/ocular motor function and anxiety following concussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0472
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Co-Occurrence of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Provocation and State Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults with Concussion

Philip Schatz, Michael W. Collins, Melissa N. Womble, Sheri Fedor et al.
2 citations
Journal of Neurotrauma
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
0.77
article

The Co-Occurrence of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Provocation and State Anxiety in Adolescents and Young Adults with Concussion

Philip Schatz, Michael W. Collins, Melissa N. Womble, Sheri Fedor, Anthony P. Kontos, Aaron J. Zynda, R.J. Elbin, Kori J. Durfee, Sabrina Jennings
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety are both independently linked to poor recovery outcomes following concussion. However, the relationship between these two clinical presentations and their co-occurring effects on concussion recovery outcomes is understudied. The purpose was to examine the co-occurring effects of vestibular/ocular motor provocation and state anxiety following concussion. There were 532 participants (15-25 years) with concussions who completed the vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale within 30 days of injury. Participants were classified into provocation (PROV) and no provocation (NO PROV) groups based on exceeding/not exceeding VOMS cutoffs. An analysis of covariance was used to examine between-group comparisons on state anxiety scores; and logistic regressions, with adjusted odds ratios (Adj OR), were used to evaluate predictors of clinical levels of state anxiety and protracted recovery. A total of 418 participants (78.6%; age = 17.2 ± 2.6; 65% female) exceeding VOMS cutoffs were in the PROV, and 114 (21.4%; age = 16.6 ± 2.2; 53% female) participants were in the NO PROV group. The PROV group (mean [<i>M</i>] <i>=</i> 39.50, standard deviation [<i>SD</i>] <i>=</i> 12.05) exhibited significantly higher state anxiety scores than the NO PROV group (<i>M =</i> 32.45, <i>SD =</i> 10.43) (<i>F</i>[1, 532] = 15.36, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.03). Vestibular/ocular motor provocation (Adj OR = 3.35, <i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-3.88) was the most robust predictor of clinical state anxiety following concussion (χ<sup>2</sup> [4, 532] = 86.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants exhibiting vestibular/ocular motor provocation with clinical levels of state anxiety were at 2.47 times (<i>p</i> < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.53-3.99) greater odds of experiencing a protracted concussion recovery than participants with vestibular/ocular motor provocation without clinical state anxiety. Vestibular/ocular motor provocation is associated with increased state anxiety following concussion, and the addition of clinical state anxiety to vestibular/ocular motor provocation increases the odds for protracted recovery. Clinicians should assess vestibular/ocular motor function and anxiety following concussion.

Journal of NeurotraumaVol. 42(11-12)
Inova Fairfax Hospital (US), Sports Concussion Institute (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Saint Joseph's University (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.