Influence of Yeast Interactions on the Fermentation Process and Aroma Production in Synthetic Cocoa Pulp vs. Real Mucilage Media

Cocoa fermentation plays a key role in defining chocolate’s flavor, with yeasts being central to this process. This study aimed to explore intraspecific genetic diversity of major indigenous yeasts (i.e., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kudriavzevii), and their potential interaction in the cocoa pulp environment. Their metabolic intraspecific diversity was characterized in synthetic cocoa pulp medium. Then, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia kudriavzevii, and other strains were introduced to each other to evaluate their potential negative interaction. Interesting strain associations were selected to further explore their interaction in synthetic cocoa pulp medium as well as real fresh cocoa pulp. From a fermentation campaign in Ivory Coast, a set of Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae and Pichia (P.) kudriavzevii strains were isolated from batches classified according to their chocolate quality (i.e., standard, intermediate, or premium chocolate). Less abundant species (i.e., Torulaspora franciscae, Kluyveromyces marxianus) were also isolated and tested for their potential negative interactions with S. cerevisiae and P. kudriavzevii. A set of strains were selected and cultured in single and in co-culture in a minimal cocoa pulp synthetic medium and in fresh cocoa pulp to highlight potential positive and/or negative interactions regarding fermentative aroma profile (i.e., higher alcohols, acetate esters, medium-chain fatty acids, and ethyl esters). The results highlighted the dominance of S. cerevisiae in fermentation kinetics and medium- to long-chain ester production, contrasted with P. kudriavzevii’s efficiency in short-chain ester synthesis. Intraspecific aroma profile variations can be pointed out. The co-cultures of P. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae strains isolated from the premium chocolate batch had a positive impact on the fermented pulp aroma profile. Negative interactions were observed with Torulaspora franciscae, which eliminated P. kudriavzevii’s aroma expression. Finally, the comparison of the data obtained for the minimal cocoa pulp synthetic medium compared to the cocoa pulp allowed us to draw conclusions about the use of synthetic media for studying cocoa fermentation. These findings emphasize the complex microbial interactions in cocoa fermentation that could shape future cocoa bean aroma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fermentation
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation10120662
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Yeast Interactions on the Fermentation Process and Aroma Production in Synthetic Cocoa Pulp vs. Real Mucilage Media

Caroline Strub, Da Lorn, Joël Grabulos, Alexandre Colas de la Noue et al.
4 citations
Fermentation
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
1.39
article

Influence of Yeast Interactions on the Fermentation Process and Aroma Production in Synthetic Cocoa Pulp vs. Real Mucilage Media

Caroline Strub, Da Lorn, Joël Grabulos, Alexandre Colas de la Noue, Sabine Schorr‐Galindo, Christelle Kouamé, Angélique Fontana, Renaud Boulanger, Lydie Besançon, Marc Lebrun
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Cocoa fermentation plays a key role in defining chocolate’s flavor, with yeasts being central to this process. This study aimed to explore intraspecific genetic diversity of major indigenous yeasts (i.e., Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia kudriavzevii), and their potential interaction in the cocoa pulp environment. Their metabolic intraspecific diversity was characterized in synthetic cocoa pulp medium. Then, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia kudriavzevii, and other strains were introduced to each other to evaluate their potential negative interaction. Interesting strain associations were selected to further explore their interaction in synthetic cocoa pulp medium as well as real fresh cocoa pulp. From a fermentation campaign in Ivory Coast, a set of Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae and Pichia (P.) kudriavzevii strains were isolated from batches classified according to their chocolate quality (i.e., standard, intermediate, or premium chocolate). Less abundant species (i.e., Torulaspora franciscae, Kluyveromyces marxianus) were also isolated and tested for their potential negative interactions with S. cerevisiae and P. kudriavzevii. A set of strains were selected and cultured in single and in co-culture in a minimal cocoa pulp synthetic medium and in fresh cocoa pulp to highlight potential positive and/or negative interactions regarding fermentative aroma profile (i.e., higher alcohols, acetate esters, medium-chain fatty acids, and ethyl esters). The results highlighted the dominance of S. cerevisiae in fermentation kinetics and medium- to long-chain ester production, contrasted with P. kudriavzevii’s efficiency in short-chain ester synthesis. Intraspecific aroma profile variations can be pointed out. The co-cultures of P. kudriavzevii and S. cerevisiae strains isolated from the premium chocolate batch had a positive impact on the fermented pulp aroma profile. Negative interactions were observed with Torulaspora franciscae, which eliminated P. kudriavzevii’s aroma expression. Finally, the comparison of the data obtained for the minimal cocoa pulp synthetic medium compared to the cocoa pulp allowed us to draw conclusions about the use of synthetic media for studying cocoa fermentation. These findings emphasize the complex microbial interactions in cocoa fermentation that could shape future cocoa bean aroma.

FermentationVol. 10(12)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.