Technocratic Elements of Reformatting the Ideological Field

This article explores the specifics of technocracy as a form of government and an ideology. Given the significance of the topic of the intersection between technological advancements and the political process, it is evident that it is essential to examine and analyze the characteristics and potential of technocracy as a political system that lies at the intersection of scientific and technological development and governance. Technocracy is examined from three perspectives: its classical understanding, its modern interpretation, and as an independent ideological movement known as Technocratism. The author concludes that the communicative aspects of technocracy align with the interests of a modern, sovereign state. However, at the same time, the concept of technocracy is burdened by a significant number of ideological discrepancies that prevent its implementation without infringing on the rights and liberties of the populace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-4-46-51
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technocratic Elements of Reformatting the Ideological Field

I. S. Pyatibratov
Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial University
Digital Education and Society
article

Technocratic Elements of Reformatting the Ideological Field

I. S. Pyatibratov
article en

Abstract

This article explores the specifics of technocracy as a form of government and an ideology. Given the significance of the topic of the intersection between technological advancements and the political process, it is evident that it is essential to examine and analyze the characteristics and potential of technocracy as a political system that lies at the intersection of scientific and technological development and governance. Technocracy is examined from three perspectives: its classical understanding, its modern interpretation, and as an independent ideological movement known as Technocratism. The author concludes that the communicative aspects of technocracy align with the interests of a modern, sovereign state. However, at the same time, the concept of technocracy is burdened by a significant number of ideological discrepancies that prevent its implementation without infringing on the rights and liberties of the populace.

Humanities and Social Sciences Bulletin of the Financial UniversityVol. 14(4)
Financial University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.