Cold scissors ploughing technique versus electrosurgical excision for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) may lead to abnormal menstruation, infertility, and pregnancy-related complications. Hysteroscopic separation is the gold standard treatment for IUA and can be performed using a variety of instruments and methods, including cold scissors and electrotomy. However, it is unclear which method is more effective for relieving IUA, restoring uterine anatomy, and improving the pregnancy rate in women of childbearing age. This multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial included 218 women aged 20-40 years who were treated for IUA between 1 March 2021 and 30 June 2022 and followed for 1.5 years. The women were randomly assigned to a cold scissors group ( n = 109) or electrosurgical excision group ( n = 109). Second-look hysteroscopy was performed in all patients within 3-10 days after the end of the first postoperative menstrual period. The primary outcome was the change in American Fertility Society score. Secondary outcomes included postoperative menstrual blood loss, the recurrence rate, and the reproductive outcome. There was no significant difference in the curative effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis between the cold scissors group and the electrosurgical excision group (5 [interquartile range, 4-6] vs. 5 [interquartile range, 4-6], P = 0.729) or in the postoperative recurrence rate (27.5% vs. 30.6%, relative risk 0.901, 95% confidence interval 0.594-1.366, P = 0.623) or pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative menstrual blood loss was significantly greater in the cold scissors group than in the electrosurgical excision group (65.1% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.029). The treatment cost was significantly lower in the cold scissors group ( P < 0.001). In conclusion, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors does not differ significantly from electrosurgery in terms of treatment efficacy, recurrence rate, pregnancy rate, or pregnancy-related complications in patients with IUA who have normal ovarian reserve and an endometrial thickness of ≥6 mm before ovulation. The cold scissors ploughing technique can increase menstrual blood loss and is a cost-effective procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000002182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cold scissors ploughing technique versus electrosurgical excision for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Pingping Xue, Guixiang Lv, Ping Wang, Hui Wang et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Surgery
Gynecological conditions and treatments
0.58
article

Cold scissors ploughing technique versus electrosurgical excision for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Pingping Xue, Guixiang Lv, Ping Wang, Hui Wang, Yi‐Chun Liu, Yinghua Qi, Xiaoshi Xie, Yanan Zhang, Fang Yuan, Kejuan Song, Zongzhi Yang, Lei Yan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) may lead to abnormal menstruation, infertility, and pregnancy-related complications. Hysteroscopic separation is the gold standard treatment for IUA and can be performed using a variety of instruments and methods, including cold scissors and electrotomy. However, it is unclear which method is more effective for relieving IUA, restoring uterine anatomy, and improving the pregnancy rate in women of childbearing age. This multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial included 218 women aged 20-40 years who were treated for IUA between 1 March 2021 and 30 June 2022 and followed for 1.5 years. The women were randomly assigned to a cold scissors group ( n = 109) or electrosurgical excision group ( n = 109). Second-look hysteroscopy was performed in all patients within 3-10 days after the end of the first postoperative menstrual period. The primary outcome was the change in American Fertility Society score. Secondary outcomes included postoperative menstrual blood loss, the recurrence rate, and the reproductive outcome. There was no significant difference in the curative effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis between the cold scissors group and the electrosurgical excision group (5 [interquartile range, 4-6] vs. 5 [interquartile range, 4-6], P = 0.729) or in the postoperative recurrence rate (27.5% vs. 30.6%, relative risk 0.901, 95% confidence interval 0.594-1.366, P = 0.623) or pregnancy outcomes between the two groups. Postoperative menstrual blood loss was significantly greater in the cold scissors group than in the electrosurgical excision group (65.1% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.029). The treatment cost was significantly lower in the cold scissors group ( P < 0.001). In conclusion, hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors does not differ significantly from electrosurgery in terms of treatment efficacy, recurrence rate, pregnancy rate, or pregnancy-related complications in patients with IUA who have normal ovarian reserve and an endometrial thickness of ≥6 mm before ovulation. The cold scissors ploughing technique can increase menstrual blood loss and is a cost-effective procedure.

International Journal of SurgeryVol. 111(2)
Qingdao University (CN), Shandong University (CN), Linyi People's Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Zoucheng People's Hospital (CN), Qingdao Municipal Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital (CN), State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.