MixtureFinder: Estimating DNA Mixture Models for Phylogenetic Analyses

In phylogenetic studies, both partitioned models and mixture models are used to account for heterogeneity in molecular evolution among the sites of DNA sequence alignments. Partitioned models require the user to specify the grouping of sites into subsets, and then assume that each subset of sites can be modeled by a single common process. Mixture models do not require users to prespecify subsets of sites, and instead calculate the likelihood of every site under every model, while co-estimating the model weights and parameters. While much research has gone into the optimization of partitioned models by merging user-specified subsets, there has been less attention paid to the optimization of mixture models for DNA sequence alignments. In this study, we first ask whether a key assumption of partitioned models-that each user-specified subset can be modeled by a single common process-is supported by the data. Having shown that this is not the case, we then design, implement, test, and apply an algorithm, MixtureFinder, to select the optimum number of classes for a mixture model of Q-matrices for the standard models of DNA sequence evolution. We show this algorithm performs well on simulated and empirical datasets and suggest that it may be useful for future empirical studies. MixtureFinder is available in IQ-TREE2, and a tutorial for using MixtureFinder can be found here: http://www.iqtree.org/doc/Complex-Models#mixture-models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae264
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MixtureFinder: Estimating DNA Mixture Models for Phylogenetic Analyses

Huaiyan Ren, Bùi Quang Minh, Robert Lanfear, Thomas K. F. Wong
19 citations
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
4.44
article

MixtureFinder: Estimating DNA Mixture Models for Phylogenetic Analyses

Huaiyan Ren, Bùi Quang Minh, Robert Lanfear, Thomas K. F. Wong
article en
19 citations

Abstract

In phylogenetic studies, both partitioned models and mixture models are used to account for heterogeneity in molecular evolution among the sites of DNA sequence alignments. Partitioned models require the user to specify the grouping of sites into subsets, and then assume that each subset of sites can be modeled by a single common process. Mixture models do not require users to prespecify subsets of sites, and instead calculate the likelihood of every site under every model, while co-estimating the model weights and parameters. While much research has gone into the optimization of partitioned models by merging user-specified subsets, there has been less attention paid to the optimization of mixture models for DNA sequence alignments. In this study, we first ask whether a key assumption of partitioned models-that each user-specified subset can be modeled by a single common process-is supported by the data. Having shown that this is not the case, we then design, implement, test, and apply an algorithm, MixtureFinder, to select the optimum number of classes for a mixture model of Q-matrices for the standard models of DNA sequence evolution. We show this algorithm performs well on simulated and empirical datasets and suggest that it may be useful for future empirical studies. MixtureFinder is available in IQ-TREE2, and a tutorial for using MixtureFinder can be found here: http://www.iqtree.org/doc/Complex-Models#mixture-models.

Molecular Biology and EvolutionVol. 42(1)
Australian National University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
4.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.