The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Narratives: A Comparative Critical Analysis

This review aims to analyze critically the Western and Chinese narratives surrounding the BRI and their intricate connections. Western skeptic narratives, particularly those from the US, are often critical of BRI from three angles: geopolitical, economic, and security. The US views the initiative as a means for China to pursue its hidden ambition of becoming the world's foremost power. This is a nonviable economic scheme that only serves China's rise. On the contrary, China portrays BRI as an economic initiative for shared progress and win-win collaboration. The analysis finds that the narratives put forth by the United States tend to place excessive emphasis on political motives due to their competition with Beijing. While no strong empirical evidence supports Western allegations, China has struggled to convey the BRI's vision appositely in the global sphere. Furthermore, some financial tribulations in a few BRI states created puzzles and gave more life to Western narrations. Failure to address the different state-based BRI challenges could reinforce biased perceptions. The descriptive-interpretive qualitative analysis method is employed to realize the article's objectives. This precise analysis comprehensively elucidates the reasons behind the diverse reactions towards the BRI and its future challenges. The findings and recommended measures offer constructive and pragmatic actions for policymakers or stakeholders to navigate the complex partisan perceptions and concerns. Proper execution of these measures could ensure the smooth implementation of BRI and greater positive consequences. The insights of inquiry may help future research in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China and WTO Review
Published
2024-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52152/cwr.2024.10.1.04
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Narratives: A Comparative Critical Analysis

Mohammad Shakil Bhuiyan, Yi Wang
1 citations
China and WTO Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
article

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Narratives: A Comparative Critical Analysis

Mohammad Shakil Bhuiyan, Yi Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This review aims to analyze critically the Western and Chinese narratives surrounding the BRI and their intricate connections. Western skeptic narratives, particularly those from the US, are often critical of BRI from three angles: geopolitical, economic, and security. The US views the initiative as a means for China to pursue its hidden ambition of becoming the world's foremost power. This is a nonviable economic scheme that only serves China's rise. On the contrary, China portrays BRI as an economic initiative for shared progress and win-win collaboration. The analysis finds that the narratives put forth by the United States tend to place excessive emphasis on political motives due to their competition with Beijing. While no strong empirical evidence supports Western allegations, China has struggled to convey the BRI's vision appositely in the global sphere. Furthermore, some financial tribulations in a few BRI states created puzzles and gave more life to Western narrations. Failure to address the different state-based BRI challenges could reinforce biased perceptions. The descriptive-interpretive qualitative analysis method is employed to realize the article's objectives. This precise analysis comprehensively elucidates the reasons behind the diverse reactions towards the BRI and its future challenges. The findings and recommended measures offer constructive and pragmatic actions for policymakers or stakeholders to navigate the complex partisan perceptions and concerns. Proper execution of these measures could ensure the smooth implementation of BRI and greater positive consequences. The insights of inquiry may help future research in this domain.

China and WTO ReviewVol. 10(1)
Shanxi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.