Using a conceptual model to describe organic food process quality: the perspective of consumers

Abstract The food chain actors hold different perspectives on organic food quality. For processors, it is important to align their quality design with consumer expectations. Based on the organic food quality model by Vasileva et al. (Org Agr 9:1-12, 2019) this study investigates the consumer perspective on organic food processing, focusing on natural variations and modern technology with fruit juice as the main example product. In September 2021, we conducted four online focus groups with 29 organic shoppers from Germany (15 female, 14 male; between 18 and 70 years old) and performed a qualitative text analysis. The participants expect environmental and social sustainability in organic food production. For them, organic quality means a lower processing degree and less standardization. They are sceptic about blending and the production of juice made from concentrate. They prefer directly bottled juice and accept more variations of juice characteristics. They are open to modern technologies if these are environmentally friendly and socially acceptable. They are interested in raising their food literacy and show trust in information offered by processors. To bridge information asymmetry, they use several indicators. Comparing the results with the literature, the quality perceptions of processors and consumers are close. The model used has proven to be suitable for presenting the process quality from different perspectives and for showing relevant connections between the actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organic Agriculture
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-024-00481-6
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a conceptual model to describe organic food process quality: the perspective of consumers

Carola Strassner, Christian Herzig, Lisa Marie Rahier
Organic Agriculture
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Using a conceptual model to describe organic food process quality: the perspective of consumers

Carola Strassner, Christian Herzig, Lisa Marie Rahier
article en

Abstract

Abstract The food chain actors hold different perspectives on organic food quality. For processors, it is important to align their quality design with consumer expectations. Based on the organic food quality model by Vasileva et al. (Org Agr 9:1-12, 2019) this study investigates the consumer perspective on organic food processing, focusing on natural variations and modern technology with fruit juice as the main example product. In September 2021, we conducted four online focus groups with 29 organic shoppers from Germany (15 female, 14 male; between 18 and 70 years old) and performed a qualitative text analysis. The participants expect environmental and social sustainability in organic food production. For them, organic quality means a lower processing degree and less standardization. They are sceptic about blending and the production of juice made from concentrate. They prefer directly bottled juice and accept more variations of juice characteristics. They are open to modern technologies if these are environmentally friendly and socially acceptable. They are interested in raising their food literacy and show trust in information offered by processors. To bridge information asymmetry, they use several indicators. Comparing the results with the literature, the quality perceptions of processors and consumers are close. The model used has proven to be suitable for presenting the process quality from different perspectives and for showing relevant connections between the actors.

Organic AgricultureVol. 15(1)
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.