Adapting FAIR Evaluation to Photon and Neutron Facilities

The FAIR principles have become essential in establishing transparent and trustworthy research practices. However the FAIR principles are guidelines indicating the features expected for data to be FAIR, and do not stipulate evaluation criteria. Consequently,there has been a proliferation of approaches to FAIR evaluation to substantiate claims for FAIR-ness, establish baselines, and measure improvement. Some approaches are focussed on FAIR-ness of individual datasets, others of repositories; some require extensive human evaluation, others use automation. However, within some scientific domains, data generation and management follow well-defined processes that result in datasets annotated with metadata and archived in repositories. Existing FAIR evaluation methods consider in less detail the contribution of the processes used in collecting and analysing data and how these enable FAIR-ness. We describe the evaluation approach adopted for FAIR self-evaluation for Photon and Neutron Research Infrastructures (PaN RI’s). We review selected examples of existing FAIR evaluation frameworks designed to enable assessment at different levels, and outline four dimensions that characterise them. As no existing framework met our specific need to focus on FAIR workflows and processes inPaN RIs, it was necessary to select, combine, and adapt existing frameworks, and we developed an approach drawing heavily on the original FAIR principles, the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model, and FAIRsFAIR’s CoreTrustSeal+FAIRenabling framework. Post-evaluation feedback from ExPaNDS partners indicated that they found the FAIR self-evaluation a useful and valuable exercise forunderstanding current levels of FAIR-ness at their facilities and for articulating what implementations they have in progress or planned to support FAIR in future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Digital Curation
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.933
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting FAIR Evaluation to Photon and Neutron Facilities

Brian Matthews, Abigail McBirnie, Simon Lambert
International Journal of Digital Curation
Research Data Management Practices
article

Adapting FAIR Evaluation to Photon and Neutron Facilities

Brian Matthews, Abigail McBirnie, Simon Lambert
article en

Abstract

The FAIR principles have become essential in establishing transparent and trustworthy research practices. However the FAIR principles are guidelines indicating the features expected for data to be FAIR, and do not stipulate evaluation criteria. Consequently,there has been a proliferation of approaches to FAIR evaluation to substantiate claims for FAIR-ness, establish baselines, and measure improvement. Some approaches are focussed on FAIR-ness of individual datasets, others of repositories; some require extensive human evaluation, others use automation. However, within some scientific domains, data generation and management follow well-defined processes that result in datasets annotated with metadata and archived in repositories. Existing FAIR evaluation methods consider in less detail the contribution of the processes used in collecting and analysing data and how these enable FAIR-ness. We describe the evaluation approach adopted for FAIR self-evaluation for Photon and Neutron Research Infrastructures (PaN RI’s). We review selected examples of existing FAIR evaluation frameworks designed to enable assessment at different levels, and outline four dimensions that characterise them. As no existing framework met our specific need to focus on FAIR workflows and processes inPaN RIs, it was necessary to select, combine, and adapt existing frameworks, and we developed an approach drawing heavily on the original FAIR principles, the RDA FAIR Data Maturity Model, and FAIRsFAIR’s CoreTrustSeal+FAIRenabling framework. Post-evaluation feedback from ExPaNDS partners indicated that they found the FAIR self-evaluation a useful and valuable exercise forunderstanding current levels of FAIR-ness at their facilities and for articulating what implementations they have in progress or planned to support FAIR in future.

International Journal of Digital CurationVol. 18(1)
Scientific Computing Associates (United States) (US)
European Commission
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.