Disparate Measures: The Intersectional Economics of Women in STEM Work. By Mary A. Armstrong and Susan L. Averett. MIT Press, 2024, 376pp

In her review of _Disparate Measures: The Intersectional Economics of Women in STEM Work_ by Mary A. Armstrong and Susan L. Averett, Dr. Ana Lucia Fonseca provides a thoughtful critique of the book’s key arguments. Fonseca highlights the authors’ pioneering intersectional economic approach, which sheds light on the unique challenges faced by women of color, mothers, and women with disabilities in STEM fields. She commends Armstrong and Averett for exposing the myths of meritocracy and advocating for a shift beyond traditional diversity metrics. Fonseca’s review underscores the need for systemic change within academia, focusing on holistic support and equity rather than superficial diversity initiatives. Through her analysis, Fonseca reinforces the book’s call for a deeper interrogation of the economic and structural barriers that perpetuate inequality in STEM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ADVANCE Journal
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/advjrnl.5.2.6
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparate Measures: The Intersectional Economics of Women in STEM Work. By Mary A. Armstrong and Susan L. Averett. MIT Press, 2024, 376pp

Ana Lucia Fonseca Tapia
ADVANCE Journal
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Disparate Measures: The Intersectional Economics of Women in STEM Work. By Mary A. Armstrong and Susan L. Averett. MIT Press, 2024, 376pp

Ana Lucia Fonseca Tapia
article en

Abstract

In her review of _Disparate Measures: The Intersectional Economics of Women in STEM Work_ by Mary A. Armstrong and Susan L. Averett, Dr. Ana Lucia Fonseca provides a thoughtful critique of the book’s key arguments. Fonseca highlights the authors’ pioneering intersectional economic approach, which sheds light on the unique challenges faced by women of color, mothers, and women with disabilities in STEM fields. She commends Armstrong and Averett for exposing the myths of meritocracy and advocating for a shift beyond traditional diversity metrics. Fonseca’s review underscores the need for systemic change within academia, focusing on holistic support and equity rather than superficial diversity initiatives. Through her analysis, Fonseca reinforces the book’s call for a deeper interrogation of the economic and structural barriers that perpetuate inequality in STEM.

ADVANCE JournalVol. 5(2)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.