Evaluating PyBullet and Isaac Sim in the Scope of Robotics and Reinforcement Learning

The choice of a physics simulator is a crucial decision in robotics and reinforcement learning (RL), significantly impacting the efficiency and effectiveness. This study conducts a comprehensive comparison of two popular simulator, PyBullet and Isaac sim, to identify their strengths and limitations in facilitating RL agent training. Each environment offers distinct features in terms of fidelity and computational efficiency, making it essential to evaluate their suitability for robotic reach task and their impact on RL algorithm performance. By benchmarking these environments, we aim to provide valuable insights for researchers and developers in the robotics community, informing them about the most suitable physics simulator for their specific application and ultimately advancing the state of the art in RL-based robotics research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/robot61475.2024.10797383
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating PyBullet and Isaac Sim in the Scope of Robotics and Reinforcement Learning

Héctor Herrero, Edouard Berrocal, Basilio Sierra
4 citations
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
1.39
article

Evaluating PyBullet and Isaac Sim in the Scope of Robotics and Reinforcement Learning

Héctor Herrero, Edouard Berrocal, Basilio Sierra
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The choice of a physics simulator is a crucial decision in robotics and reinforcement learning (RL), significantly impacting the efficiency and effectiveness. This study conducts a comprehensive comparison of two popular simulator, PyBullet and Isaac sim, to identify their strengths and limitations in facilitating RL agent training. Each environment offers distinct features in terms of fidelity and computational efficiency, making it essential to evaluate their suitability for robotic reach task and their impact on RL algorithm performance. By benchmarking these environments, we aim to provide valuable insights for researchers and developers in the robotics community, informing them about the most suitable physics simulator for their specific application and ultimately advancing the state of the art in RL-based robotics research.

University of the Basque Country (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.