Extracting interpretable signatures of whole-brain dynamics through systematic comparison
The brain's complex distributed dynamics are typically quantified using a limited set of manually selected statistical properties, leaving the possibility that alternative dynamical properties may outperform those reported for a given application. Here, we address this limitation by systematically comparing diverse, interpretable features of both intra-regional activity and inter-regional functional coupling from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data, demonstrating our method using case-control comparisons of four neuropsychiatric disorders. Our findings generally support the use of linear time-series analysis techniques for rs-fMRI case-control analyses, while also identifying new ways to quantify informative dynamical fMRI structures. While simple statistical representations of fMRI dynamics performed surprisingly well (e.g., properties within a single brain region), combining intra-regional properties with inter-regional coupling generally improved performance, underscoring the distributed, multifaceted changes to fMRI dynamics in neuropsychiatric disorders. The comprehensive, data-driven method introduced here enables systematic identification and interpretation of quantitative dynamical signatures of multivariate time-series data, with applicability beyond neuroimaging to diverse scientific problems involving complex time-varying systems.
Authors
- Annie G. Bryant (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-6520)
- Kevin Aquino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7435-0236)
- Linden Parkes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-7207)
- Ben Fulcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-4055)
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Published
- 2024-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012692
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.40
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health