English Transported to Australia: Factors Affecting the Choice of Relativisation Strategies in Diaries Written from 1788 to 1900

This paper explores the distribution of different relativisation strategies, namely, the whrelatives, that and zero, in diaries written in Australia in the last decades of the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century. Several factors have been considered in order to determine the reasons behind the choice of these strategies: gender, period, status, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent. According to the results, wh-relatives were more likely to be used in the first half of the nineteenth century. In addition, the authors with low or average education tended to favour the use of non-case marked relatives to the detriment of wh-relatives. By contrast, gender was determined not to have played a role in the selection of relativisers. Furthermore, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent also influenced the relative markers that could be present in a specific syntactic slot.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2024-46.2.02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

English Transported to Australia: Factors Affecting the Choice of Relativisation Strategies in Diaries Written from 1788 to 1900

1 citations
Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies
Multilingual Education and Policy
1.88
article

English Transported to Australia: Factors Affecting the Choice of Relativisation Strategies in Diaries Written from 1788 to 1900

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the distribution of different relativisation strategies, namely, the whrelatives, that and zero, in diaries written in Australia in the last decades of the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century. Several factors have been considered in order to determine the reasons behind the choice of these strategies: gender, period, status, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent. According to the results, wh-relatives were more likely to be used in the first half of the nineteenth century. In addition, the authors with low or average education tended to favour the use of non-case marked relatives to the detriment of wh-relatives. By contrast, gender was determined not to have played a role in the selection of relativisers. Furthermore, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent also influenced the relative markers that could be present in a specific syntactic slot.

Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American StudiesVol. 46(2)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multilingual Education and Policy
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

English Transported to Australia: Factors Affecting the Choice of Relativisation Strategies in Diaries Written from 1788 to 1900 · Atlantis Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS