The limits of artificial intelligence: prospects and challenges in the clinical workplace

Purpose of review Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in the clinical workplace, a trend that is likely to continue with the amount of attention and resources these technologies receive. This review of 22 articles from the last 18 months takes stock of not only the prospects but also the challenges for clinicians resulting from AI integration. Recent findings While the technology matures rapidly, insights into organizational processes and user readiness and involvement in AI development, implementation, and deployment lag behind. AI impact assessments often focus narrowly on task efficiency, overlooking the derived effect of additional workload elsewhere. Additionally, the issue of the distribution of responsibility between humans and AIs poses a fundamental ethical, legal, and political challenge. Research acknowledges the need to consider healthcare professionals’ diverse roles and sociocultural backgrounds to avoid AI exacerbating existing inequalities among the clinical workforce and, ultimately, the patients cared for. Summary Decision-makers should involve users throughout the entire AI life cycle, from the early stages of AI development to continuous postdeployment impact assessment on workload. More research is needed on AI's cost-effectiveness, integration into clinical practice, and the role of diversity-aware facilitation in realizing its potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Epidemiology and Public Health
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pxh.0000000000000046
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The limits of artificial intelligence: prospects and challenges in the clinical workplace

Anna Schneider‐Kamp, Søren Askegaard
3 citations
Current Opinion in Epidemiology and Public Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
article

The limits of artificial intelligence: prospects and challenges in the clinical workplace

Anna Schneider‐Kamp, Søren Askegaard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose of review Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent in the clinical workplace, a trend that is likely to continue with the amount of attention and resources these technologies receive. This review of 22 articles from the last 18 months takes stock of not only the prospects but also the challenges for clinicians resulting from AI integration. Recent findings While the technology matures rapidly, insights into organizational processes and user readiness and involvement in AI development, implementation, and deployment lag behind. AI impact assessments often focus narrowly on task efficiency, overlooking the derived effect of additional workload elsewhere. Additionally, the issue of the distribution of responsibility between humans and AIs poses a fundamental ethical, legal, and political challenge. Research acknowledges the need to consider healthcare professionals’ diverse roles and sociocultural backgrounds to avoid AI exacerbating existing inequalities among the clinical workforce and, ultimately, the patients cared for. Summary Decision-makers should involve users throughout the entire AI life cycle, from the early stages of AI development to continuous postdeployment impact assessment on workload. More research is needed on AI's cost-effectiveness, integration into clinical practice, and the role of diversity-aware facilitation in realizing its potential.

Current Opinion in Epidemiology and Public HealthVol. 4(1)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense Municipality (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.