Evaluation of the Impact of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) on Non-Target Soil Organisms in the Olive Orchard: Drone (Aerial) Spraying vs. Tractor (Ground) Spraying

Policies aimed at reducing plant protection products (PPPs) are part of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable management of PPPs is crucial for soil health, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, including food provision. While PPPs can control pests and enhance agricultural yields, they also pose environmental and health risks by contaminating water, soil, and non-target organisms through airborne drift. Investigating innovative and more sustainable distribution methods can support sustainability goals. This study aimed to evaluate the potential impact of the pesticide Spintor® Fly on non-target soil organisms in olive orchards comparing two spraying methods: a traditional Casotti® pump mounted on a tractor and an innovative Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) developed for the project. The study was conducted in 2021 in an organic olive orchard, which was divided into two plots: a Casotti-treated plot (CAS) and a drone-treated plot (DRO). A strip of uncultivated land at the edge of the orchard was used as a (non-treated) control plot (CAP). The impact on native soil microarthropod communities was assessed using the arthropod-based Soil Biological Quality Index (QBS-ar) and Bait Lamina Test (BLT). Soil samples were collected for earthworm avoidance tests and soil chemical–physical analysis. The results obtained with QBS-ar and BLT indicated no significant differences between DRO and CAS, in both sampling periods (pre- and post-treatment). However, DRO generally exhibited slightly better performance than CAS. The avoidance behaviour was confirmed for both CAS and DRO, although it was lower for the latter. Overall, drone aerial spray performed slightly better, suggesting a potentially lower impact on soil communities. Our results provide initial clues for the sustainable use of drones in agriculture with no increased risks for soil health compared to traditional methods. Further long-term studies should be conducted to validate these findings and possibly confirm the long-term benefits of drone applications compared to traditional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411302
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Impact of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) on Non-Target Soil Organisms in the Olive Orchard: Drone (Aerial) Spraying vs. Tractor (Ground) Spraying

Gilda Dell’Ambrogio, Antonietta La Terza, Mathieu Renaud, Benoit J. D. Ferrari et al.
7 citations
Sustainability
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
3.78
article

Evaluation of the Impact of Plant Protection Products (PPPs) on Non-Target Soil Organisms in the Olive Orchard: Drone (Aerial) Spraying vs. Tractor (Ground) Spraying

Gilda Dell’Ambrogio, Antonietta La Terza, Mathieu Renaud, Benoit J. D. Ferrari, M. Della Coletta, Aurora Torresi, Aldo D’Alessandro
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Policies aimed at reducing plant protection products (PPPs) are part of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable management of PPPs is crucial for soil health, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, including food provision. While PPPs can control pests and enhance agricultural yields, they also pose environmental and health risks by contaminating water, soil, and non-target organisms through airborne drift. Investigating innovative and more sustainable distribution methods can support sustainability goals. This study aimed to evaluate the potential impact of the pesticide Spintor® Fly on non-target soil organisms in olive orchards comparing two spraying methods: a traditional Casotti® pump mounted on a tractor and an innovative Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) developed for the project. The study was conducted in 2021 in an organic olive orchard, which was divided into two plots: a Casotti-treated plot (CAS) and a drone-treated plot (DRO). A strip of uncultivated land at the edge of the orchard was used as a (non-treated) control plot (CAP). The impact on native soil microarthropod communities was assessed using the arthropod-based Soil Biological Quality Index (QBS-ar) and Bait Lamina Test (BLT). Soil samples were collected for earthworm avoidance tests and soil chemical–physical analysis. The results obtained with QBS-ar and BLT indicated no significant differences between DRO and CAS, in both sampling periods (pre- and post-treatment). However, DRO generally exhibited slightly better performance than CAS. The avoidance behaviour was confirmed for both CAS and DRO, although it was lower for the latter. Overall, drone aerial spray performed slightly better, suggesting a potentially lower impact on soil communities. Our results provide initial clues for the sustainable use of drones in agriculture with no increased risks for soil health compared to traditional methods. Further long-term studies should be conducted to validate these findings and possibly confirm the long-term benefits of drone applications compared to traditional methods.

SustainabilityVol. 16(24)
Università di Camerino (IT), Agroscope (CH), Federal Office for Agriculture (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Regione Marche
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
3.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.