Seismic Capacity of Unstrengthened and FRP Strengthened Masonry Arches: Tilting Test and Nonlinear Numerical Analysis

ABSTRACT Cultural heritage preservation requires a deeper understanding of their seismic response and imposes the use of effective strengthening methods. Fibre‐reinforced polymers (FRP) have emerged as an effective solution for strengthening masonry structural elements. The decision over the optimal configuration for a FRP‐based strengthening is a trade‐off between different objective functions such as strength, inelastic stiffness and cost. Although some studies have explored design alternatives and topology optimisation, experimental investigation remains limited, especially regarding the evaluation of seismic response. This study investigates the seismic capacity of unstrengthened and strengthened mortared–masonry arches through tilting table experiments and numerical simulations. The optimal strengthening arrangement is obtained through topology optimisation, and experimental results demonstrate its performance. A three‐dimensional numerical model, following a macro‐modelling approach through the so‐called concrete damage plasticity material model, is adopted. Numerical results are validated with existing literature and experimental data. A parametric study is conducted for full‐scale arches to evaluate the effect of dimensions and the embrace angle of masonry arches. The study reveals that the numerical model successfully replicates masonry arches' nonlinear behaviour and hinge mechanism. In addition, both experimental and numerical results highlight the effectiveness of optimised strengthening placement achieved through topology optimisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4294
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Capacity of Unstrengthened and FRP Strengthened Masonry Arches: Tilting Test and Nonlinear Numerical Analysis

Paulo B. Lourénço, İsmail Hakkı Tarhan, Habib Uysal, Nathanaël Savalle et al.
8 citations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.12
article

Seismic Capacity of Unstrengthened and FRP Strengthened Masonry Arches: Tilting Test and Nonlinear Numerical Analysis

Paulo B. Lourénço, İsmail Hakkı Tarhan, Habib Uysal, Nathanaël Savalle, Luís C. Silva
article en
8 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cultural heritage preservation requires a deeper understanding of their seismic response and imposes the use of effective strengthening methods. Fibre‐reinforced polymers (FRP) have emerged as an effective solution for strengthening masonry structural elements. The decision over the optimal configuration for a FRP‐based strengthening is a trade‐off between different objective functions such as strength, inelastic stiffness and cost. Although some studies have explored design alternatives and topology optimisation, experimental investigation remains limited, especially regarding the evaluation of seismic response. This study investigates the seismic capacity of unstrengthened and strengthened mortared–masonry arches through tilting table experiments and numerical simulations. The optimal strengthening arrangement is obtained through topology optimisation, and experimental results demonstrate its performance. A three‐dimensional numerical model, following a macro‐modelling approach through the so‐called concrete damage plasticity material model, is adopted. Numerical results are validated with existing literature and experimental data. A parametric study is conducted for full‐scale arches to evaluate the effect of dimensions and the embrace angle of masonry arches. The study reveals that the numerical model successfully replicates masonry arches' nonlinear behaviour and hinge mechanism. In addition, both experimental and numerical results highlight the effectiveness of optimised strengthening placement achieved through topology optimisation.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 54(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Pascal (FR), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR), Politecnico di Milano (IT), University of Minho (PT)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.