Comparison of positive BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panels, CSF cultures, CSF parameters, clinical presentation and in-patient mortality among patients with bacterial and fungal meningitis
This study compares the performance of the meningitis/encephalitis panel (MEP) in detecting bacterial and fungal pathogens with cerebrospinal fluid cultures and other parameters. Almost half of bacterial analytes of MEP had positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood cultures; the remaining 42% of bacterial analytes were correlated with clinical presentation and other CSF parameters. 27.4% (29 out of 106) cases would not have had a pathogen definitively identified if the MEP had not been used. This study highlights the importance of using MEP as a diagnostic tool, especially in patients who have already received antibiotics, where traditional culture-based methods may not be diagnostic. This research underscores the use of MEP in improving the speed of diagnosing meningitis. However, it emphasizes that MEP can produce false positive results in some patients. It is therefore necessary to interpret MEP results together with clinical assessments and other diagnostic tests to ensure the most accurate diagnosis.
Authors
- Jaime Soria (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-0502)
- Thein Myint (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-4120)
- Yuanzheng Gao
- Julie A. Ribes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4563-6008)
- Vaneet Arora
- Marice Ruiz Conejo Castillo
Institutions
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Crescent University (NG)
- Cooper University Health Care (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Published
- 2024-12-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00014-24
- Citations
- 9
- Primary Topic
- Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.10
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences