Vulnerability as identity facet: reconceptualizing vulnerability to conduct civically engaged research

Civically engaged research offers significant potential to co-produce knowledge with systematically marginalized communities. However, the greater engagement with community partners as part of civically engaged research requires scholars to more deeply consider what vulnerability means in civically engaged research in an effort to minimize potential harm to community partners. We offer the vulnerability as identity facet (VIF) framework as a way to more deeply engage with the concept of vulnerability. In the VIF framework, we argue that vulnerability should be considered as a variable in its own right which varies by context and which requires reflexivity on the part of the scholar when evaluating risk with community partners. We demonstrate the utility of this view of vulnerability by applying the VIF framework to civically engaged research in natural disaster situations and in authoritarian contexts. In these examples, the VIF framework prompts additional methodological considerations and we lay out ways to enact this view of vulnerability.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics Groups and Identities
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2024.2423074
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vulnerability as identity facet: reconceptualizing vulnerability to conduct civically engaged research

Frank Reichert, Stephanie Chan, Rosa Castillo Krewson
3 citations
Politics Groups and Identities
Disaster Management and Resilience
3.40
article

Vulnerability as identity facet: reconceptualizing vulnerability to conduct civically engaged research

Frank Reichert, Stephanie Chan, Rosa Castillo Krewson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Civically engaged research offers significant potential to co-produce knowledge with systematically marginalized communities. However, the greater engagement with community partners as part of civically engaged research requires scholars to more deeply consider what vulnerability means in civically engaged research in an effort to minimize potential harm to community partners. We offer the vulnerability as identity facet (VIF) framework as a way to more deeply engage with the concept of vulnerability. In the VIF framework, we argue that vulnerability should be considered as a variable in its own right which varies by context and which requires reflexivity on the part of the scholar when evaluating risk with community partners. We demonstrate the utility of this view of vulnerability by applying the VIF framework to civically engaged research in natural disaster situations and in authoritarian contexts. In these examples, the VIF framework prompts additional methodological considerations and we lay out ways to enact this view of vulnerability.<br>

Politics Groups and Identities
Deutsches Historisches Institut Washington (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), American University (US), Lafayette College (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disaster Management and Resilience
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Vulnerability as identity facet: reconceptualizing vulnerability to conduct civically engaged research — Frank Reichert, Stephanie Chan, et al. · Politics Groups and Identities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS