Economic Viability of Integrated CO<sub>2</sub> Capture and Conversion

The capture of CO2 using alkaline solutions requires significant thermal energy to release CO2 from a (bi)carbonate-enriched solution. This release of CO2 can instead be performed electrochemically with a “bicarbonate electrolyzer”. The bicarbonate electrolyzer forms acid equivalents to convert a (bi)carbonate-enriched eluent from a CO2 capture unit into CO2 and, in turn, an upgraded carbon product such as CO and ethylene. There exists a tension for this closed-loop cycle to be put into practice: a smaller CO2 capture unit is required when using a more caustic CO2 capture solution, yet the electrolyzer works more effectively at a lower pH. Here, we elaborate on three different methods to align different pH regimes to couple air capture to CO2 electrolysis. We also use a mass-balance model to assess the commercial viability of a reactive carbon capture system that integrates the CO2 capture unit with a bicarbonate electrolyzer to show a levelized CO breakeven price below $1 kgCO–1. These economics, coupled with the other practical advantages of providing an electrolyzer with a liquid feedstock, present a compelling case for reactive carbon capture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Energy Letters
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02852
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Viability of Integrated CO2 Capture and Conversion

Marzieh Namdari, Curtis P. Berlinguette, Douglas J. D. Pimlott, Yifu Chen et al.
22 citations
ACS Energy Letters
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
4.68
article

Economic Viability of Integrated CO2 Capture and Conversion

Marzieh Namdari, Curtis P. Berlinguette, Douglas J. D. Pimlott, Yifu Chen, Andrew Jewlal, Yongwook Kim, Monika Stolar
article en
22 citations

Abstract

The capture of CO2 using alkaline solutions requires significant thermal energy to release CO2 from a (bi)carbonate-enriched solution. This release of CO2 can instead be performed electrochemically with a “bicarbonate electrolyzer”. The bicarbonate electrolyzer forms acid equivalents to convert a (bi)carbonate-enriched eluent from a CO2 capture unit into CO2 and, in turn, an upgraded carbon product such as CO and ethylene. There exists a tension for this closed-loop cycle to be put into practice: a smaller CO2 capture unit is required when using a more caustic CO2 capture solution, yet the electrolyzer works more effectively at a lower pH. Here, we elaborate on three different methods to align different pH regimes to couple air capture to CO2 electrolysis. We also use a mass-balance model to assess the commercial viability of a reactive carbon capture system that integrates the CO2 capture unit with a bicarbonate electrolyzer to show a levelized CO breakeven price below $1 kgCO–1. These economics, coupled with the other practical advantages of providing an electrolyzer with a liquid feedstock, present a compelling case for reactive carbon capture.

ACS Energy LettersVol. 10(1)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), University of British Columbia (CA)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chairs, Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
4.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.