Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods in High Dimensional Time Series

Working with high-dimensional datasets increases the workload on machine learning models. Therefore, before making predictions, the most meaningful data points in the entire data set must be determined. It is highly important to improve model performance, especially in the field of machine learning. For this reason, five feature selection methods—Mutual Information, Principal Component Analysis, Chi-square, Information Gain, and Variance Thresholding—commonly used in the literature, were tested on the 14400 feature data set obtained with a system previously proposed to determine the sand, silt and clay ratios in the soil. The success of these five methods is presented comparatively using R-square (R²) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics. The best results were obtained with the Information Gain method for sand (R2 = 0.44), with Chi-square for silt (R2 = 0.17), and with Variance Thresholding for clay (R2 = 0.61).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaumfd.1606090
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods in High Dimensional Time Series

Emre Kılınç
2 citations
Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi
Neural Networks and Applications
0.69
article

Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods in High Dimensional Time Series

Emre Kılınç
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Working with high-dimensional datasets increases the workload on machine learning models. Therefore, before making predictions, the most meaningful data points in the entire data set must be determined. It is highly important to improve model performance, especially in the field of machine learning. For this reason, five feature selection methods—Mutual Information, Principal Component Analysis, Chi-square, Information Gain, and Variance Thresholding—commonly used in the literature, were tested on the 14400 feature data set obtained with a system previously proposed to determine the sand, silt and clay ratios in the soil. The success of these five methods is presented comparatively using R-square (R²) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) metrics. The best results were obtained with the Information Gain method for sand (R2 = 0.44), with Chi-square for silt (R2 = 0.17), and with Variance Thresholding for clay (R2 = 0.61).

Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi DergisiVol. 39(4)
Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Neural Networks and Applications
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.