Spatial conservation planning: Proposing clustering methods to improve connectivity protection

Abstract Spatial conservation prioritization is traditionally focusing on ensuring the representation of species populations and habitats within protected areas. Recently there has been an increased interest in incorporating connectivity into planning, with higher priority given to areas exhibiting strong ecological linkages. We introduce three metrics (s‐core, Louvain clustering, walktrap clustering) that allow us to improve the spatial prioritization process by protecting areas that present high connectivity values. Instead of prioritizing unique planning units (PUs), by incorporating these metrics into spatial prioritization process we manage to identify clusters of PUs that collectively exhibit high connectivity values. This way we account for properties of connectivity structure (i.e. densely connected sites) into final detection of areas of high conservation interest. We evaluated the efficacy of these metrics in safeguarding ecological connectivity. The proposed metrics result in up to 25% higher connectivity values compared with the scenario in which no connectivity metrics are used. The results of the connectivity metrics were compared to the results obtained from other classic graph‐theoretic centrality metrics (degree, betweenness centrality, Eigenvector centrality, page rank) highlighting their potential to enhance performance across various spatial contexts. The proposed metrics can utilize existing connectivity data, such as edge lists, and their application can be tailored to address diverse conservation priorities. Overall, by illustrating the clustering properties of the connectivity datasets, the proposed metrics can introduce new approaches to improve the integration of ecological connectivity in conservation prioritization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14459
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial conservation planning: Proposing clustering methods to improve connectivity protection

Stelios Katsanevakis, Antonios D. Mazaris, Nikolaos Nagkoulis, Maria Papazekou
4 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
1.84
article

Spatial conservation planning: Proposing clustering methods to improve connectivity protection

Stelios Katsanevakis, Antonios D. Mazaris, Nikolaos Nagkoulis, Maria Papazekou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Spatial conservation prioritization is traditionally focusing on ensuring the representation of species populations and habitats within protected areas. Recently there has been an increased interest in incorporating connectivity into planning, with higher priority given to areas exhibiting strong ecological linkages. We introduce three metrics (s‐core, Louvain clustering, walktrap clustering) that allow us to improve the spatial prioritization process by protecting areas that present high connectivity values. Instead of prioritizing unique planning units (PUs), by incorporating these metrics into spatial prioritization process we manage to identify clusters of PUs that collectively exhibit high connectivity values. This way we account for properties of connectivity structure (i.e. densely connected sites) into final detection of areas of high conservation interest. We evaluated the efficacy of these metrics in safeguarding ecological connectivity. The proposed metrics result in up to 25% higher connectivity values compared with the scenario in which no connectivity metrics are used. The results of the connectivity metrics were compared to the results obtained from other classic graph‐theoretic centrality metrics (degree, betweenness centrality, Eigenvector centrality, page rank) highlighting their potential to enhance performance across various spatial contexts. The proposed metrics can utilize existing connectivity data, such as edge lists, and their application can be tailored to address diverse conservation priorities. Overall, by illustrating the clustering properties of the connectivity datasets, the proposed metrics can introduce new approaches to improve the integration of ecological connectivity in conservation prioritization.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(2)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of the Aegean (GR)
HORIZON EUROPE Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.