Genomic Medicine in the Developing World: Cancer Spectrum, Cumulative Risk and Survival Outcomes for Lynch Syndrome Variant Heterozygotes with Germline Pathogenic Variants in the MLH1 and MSH2 Genes

<b>Background</b>: Although genetic testing has improved our ability to diagnose Lynch syndrome (LS), there is still limited information on the extent of variations in the clinical and genetic landscape among LS variant heterozygotes (LSVH) in Africa. We sought to investigate the cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and survival outcomes of LSVH with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes using a LS registry in South Africa over the last 30 years. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study was conducted to retrieve demographic, clinical, and genetic data of all LSVH with P/LPVs in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes from our LS registry. Genetic data were analyzed according to cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and crude survival. We used the Chi-squared and <i>t</i>-test to assess differences between groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to analyze the cumulative risk and crude survival outcomes. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed a total of 577 LSVH from 109 families. About 450 (78%) and 127 (22%) LSVH harbored a disease-causing mutation in <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i>, respectively. A South African founder PV (<i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T) accounted for 74% (n = 426) of all LSVH. CRC was the most common diagnosed cancer in both <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> LSVH. <i>MLH1</i> LSVH had a younger age at cancer diagnosis than <i>MSH2</i> LSVH (43 vs. 47 years, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Extracolonic cancers were predominantly higher in female LSVH (n = 33, 35%) than in male LSVH (n = 8, 7%) with the <i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T founder PV. The cumulative risk of any cancer and CRC at any age was higher in <i>MLH1</i> LSVH than in <i>MSH2</i> LSVH (<i>p</i> = 0.020 and <i>p</i> = 0.036, respectively). LSVH with the <i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T PV had a better 10-year overall survival after the first cancer diagnosis, particularly for CRC. <b>Conclusions</b>: LSVH with P/LPVs in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes exhibited significant gene- and sex-specific differences in cancer spectrum, cumulative risk and survival outcomes. Cancer risk and survival estimates described in this study can be used to guide surveillance and genetic counselling for LSVH in our population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122906
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic Medicine in the Developing World: Cancer Spectrum, Cumulative Risk and Survival Outcomes for Lynch Syndrome Variant Heterozygotes with Germline Pathogenic Variants in the MLH1 and MSH2 Genes

Ramadhani Chambuso, Paul Goldberg, Adam Boutall, Raj Ramesar et al.
2 citations
Biomedicines
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
0.85
article

Genomic Medicine in the Developing World: Cancer Spectrum, Cumulative Risk and Survival Outcomes for Lynch Syndrome Variant Heterozygotes with Germline Pathogenic Variants in the MLH1 and MSH2 Genes

Ramadhani Chambuso, Paul Goldberg, Adam Boutall, Raj Ramesar, Lutricia Ndou, Ursula Algar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Although genetic testing has improved our ability to diagnose Lynch syndrome (LS), there is still limited information on the extent of variations in the clinical and genetic landscape among LS variant heterozygotes (LSVH) in Africa. We sought to investigate the cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and survival outcomes of LSVH with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes using a LS registry in South Africa over the last 30 years. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study was conducted to retrieve demographic, clinical, and genetic data of all LSVH with P/LPVs in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes from our LS registry. Genetic data were analyzed according to cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and crude survival. We used the Chi-squared and <i>t</i>-test to assess differences between groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to analyze the cumulative risk and crude survival outcomes. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. <b>Results</b>: We analyzed a total of 577 LSVH from 109 families. About 450 (78%) and 127 (22%) LSVH harbored a disease-causing mutation in <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i>, respectively. A South African founder PV (<i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T) accounted for 74% (n = 426) of all LSVH. CRC was the most common diagnosed cancer in both <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> LSVH. <i>MLH1</i> LSVH had a younger age at cancer diagnosis than <i>MSH2</i> LSVH (43 vs. 47 years, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Extracolonic cancers were predominantly higher in female LSVH (n = 33, 35%) than in male LSVH (n = 8, 7%) with the <i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T founder PV. The cumulative risk of any cancer and CRC at any age was higher in <i>MLH1</i> LSVH than in <i>MSH2</i> LSVH (<i>p</i> = 0.020 and <i>p</i> = 0.036, respectively). LSVH with the <i>MLH1</i>:c.1528C>T PV had a better 10-year overall survival after the first cancer diagnosis, particularly for CRC. <b>Conclusions</b>: LSVH with P/LPVs in the <i>MLH1</i> and <i>MSH2</i> genes exhibited significant gene- and sex-specific differences in cancer spectrum, cumulative risk and survival outcomes. Cancer risk and survival estimates described in this study can be used to guide surveillance and genetic counselling for LSVH in our population.

BiomedicinesVol. 12(12)
University of Cape Town (ZA), Groote Schuur Hospital (ZA)
South African Medical Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.