Evaluating machine learning techniques for fluid mechanics: Comparative analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency

This study focuses on applying machine learning (ML) techniques to fluid mechanics problems. Various ML techniques were used to create a series of case studies, where their accuracy and computational costs were compared, and behavior patterns in different problem types were analyzed. The goal is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of ML techniques in fluid mechanics and to contribute to the field by comparing them with traditional methods. Case studies were also conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and the results were compared with those from ML techniques in terms of accuracy and computational cost. For Case 1, after optimizing relevant parameters, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models all achieved an R² value above 0.9. However, in Case 2, only the ANN method surpassed this threshold, likely due to the limited data available. In Case 3, all models except for Linear Regression (LR) demonstrated predictive abilities above the 0.9 threshold after parameter optimization. The LR method was found to have low applicability to fluid mechanics problems, while SVM and ANN methods proved to be particularly effective tools after grid search optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Studies
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1570736
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating machine learning techniques for fluid mechanics: Comparative analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency

Eyup Koçak
3 citations
International Journal of Energy Studies
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
0.84
article

Evaluating machine learning techniques for fluid mechanics: Comparative analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency

Eyup Koçak
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study focuses on applying machine learning (ML) techniques to fluid mechanics problems. Various ML techniques were used to create a series of case studies, where their accuracy and computational costs were compared, and behavior patterns in different problem types were analyzed. The goal is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of ML techniques in fluid mechanics and to contribute to the field by comparing them with traditional methods. Case studies were also conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and the results were compared with those from ML techniques in terms of accuracy and computational cost. For Case 1, after optimizing relevant parameters, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models all achieved an R² value above 0.9. However, in Case 2, only the ANN method surpassed this threshold, likely due to the limited data available. In Case 3, all models except for Linear Regression (LR) demonstrated predictive abilities above the 0.9 threshold after parameter optimization. The LR method was found to have low applicability to fluid mechanics problems, while SVM and ANN methods proved to be particularly effective tools after grid search optimization.

International Journal of Energy StudiesVol. 9(4)
Çankaya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating machine learning techniques for fluid mechanics: Comparative analysis of accuracy and computational efficiency — Eyup Koçak · International Journal of Energy Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS