Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in tetrapods is driven by varying patterns of sex-specific selection on size

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is highly prevalent in nature. Several hypotheses aim to explain its evolution including sexual selection, differential equilibrium and ecological niche divergence. Disentangling the causal mechanism behind the evolution of SSD is challenging, as selection arising from multiple pressures on fitness may act simultaneously to generate observed patterns. Here, we use phylogenetic comparative methods to study the evolution of SSD across tetrapods globally. We estimate directional changes in body size evolution, and compare the number, phylogenetic position and magnitude of size changes between sexes. We find evidence that directional changes in size associated with SSD are typically more common in males-even in lineages where females are larger. However, underlying mechanisms differ among lineages-whereas SSD in amphibians becomes more male-biased with greater increases in male size and mammalian SSD becomes more female-biased with greater decreases in male size. Thus, differing mechanisms of directional body size evolution across sexes are essential to explain observed SSD patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02600-8
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in tetrapods is driven by varying patterns of sex-specific selection on size

Daniel Pincheira‐Donoso, Gopal Murali, Shai Meiri, Alex Slavenko et al.
7 citations
Nature Ecology & Evolution
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
7.20
article

Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in tetrapods is driven by varying patterns of sex-specific selection on size

Daniel Pincheira‐Donoso, Gopal Murali, Shai Meiri, Alex Slavenko, Natalie Cooper, Gavin H. Thomas
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is highly prevalent in nature. Several hypotheses aim to explain its evolution including sexual selection, differential equilibrium and ecological niche divergence. Disentangling the causal mechanism behind the evolution of SSD is challenging, as selection arising from multiple pressures on fitness may act simultaneously to generate observed patterns. Here, we use phylogenetic comparative methods to study the evolution of SSD across tetrapods globally. We estimate directional changes in body size evolution, and compare the number, phylogenetic position and magnitude of size changes between sexes. We find evidence that directional changes in size associated with SSD are typically more common in males-even in lineages where females are larger. However, underlying mechanisms differ among lineages-whereas SSD in amphibians becomes more male-biased with greater increases in male size and mammalian SSD becomes more female-biased with greater decreases in male size. Thus, differing mechanisms of directional body size evolution across sexes are essential to explain observed SSD patterns.

Nature Ecology & EvolutionVol. 9(3)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Natural History Museum (GB), American Museum of Natural History (US), University of Arizona (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Alexion Pharma (Switzerland) (CH), University of Sheffield (GB)
Royal Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
7.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.