How power affects postdecisional attitude change: reducing dissonance when decisions do not match with own or others’ preferences

Decisions with consequences for self and/or others do not always match the respective preferences. Following cognitive dissonance theory, one option to deal with such mismatches is to change one’s attitudes post-decision. Inducing a different focus on self or others, perceived power may moderate how and when this happens. We indeed found that high power induced more attitude change after mismatches with one’s own preferences, whereas low power led to more attitude change after mismatches with others’ preferences. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 129) showed this effect in an interpersonal setting; Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 127) revealed a similar pattern in a group context. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 184) offered an explanation by including self-affirmation of either warmth or competence values.<br>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Influence
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2024.2442941
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How power affects postdecisional attitude change: reducing dissonance when decisions do not match with own or others’ preferences

Yan Wang, Eric van Dijk, Zonghuo Yu, Niels J. Van Doesum et al.
4 links
Social Influence
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

How power affects postdecisional attitude change: reducing dissonance when decisions do not match with own or others’ preferences

Yan Wang, Eric van Dijk, Zonghuo Yu, Niels J. Van Doesum, Hao Wu, Zhenfei Yu
article en

Abstract

Decisions with consequences for self and/or others do not always match the respective preferences. Following cognitive dissonance theory, one option to deal with such mismatches is to change one’s attitudes post-decision. Inducing a different focus on self or others, perceived power may moderate how and when this happens. We indeed found that high power induced more attitude change after mismatches with one’s own preferences, whereas low power led to more attitude change after mismatches with others’ preferences. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 129) showed this effect in an interpersonal setting; Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 127) revealed a similar pattern in a group context. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 184) offered an explanation by including self-affirmation of either warmth or competence values.<br>

Social InfluenceVol. 20(1)
Leiden University (NL), Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How power affects postdecisional attitude change: reducing dissonance when decisions do not match with own or others’ preferences — Yan Wang, Eric van Dijk, et al. · Social Influence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS