Differences in Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure during Ankle Fracture ORIF between Orthopaedic Surgery and Podiatry

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Operative ankle fractures pose a unique situation as both podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons manage these injuries. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is routinely used, however, excessive radiation can be harmful to both the patient and surgical team. The primary aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the amount of intraoperative radiation exposure during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) when performed by orthopaedic surgeons versus podiatrists. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent ankle fracture ORIF at an urban level I trauma center between January 1st, 2018 and April 1st, 2023. The electronic health record was queried using International Classification of Diseases nine and 10 codes associated with ankle fractures. Patients greater than 18 years of age with an ankle fracture managed operatively were included. Subjects were then stratified by procedure. Mean total radiation dose (mRad) and mean total fluoroscopic time (seconds) were then compared between those performed by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. Results: Of the 333 included procedures, 186 were performed by orthopaedic surgeons and 147 were performed by podiatrists. Using multiple linear regression analysis to control for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index, patients undergoing isolated malleolus ORIF with syndesmosis repair performed by orthopaedic surgery were found to have a significantly lower mean fluoroscopic time compared those performed by podiatry (68.4s versus 104.8.s; p = 0.0280). Additionally, trimalleolar ORIF with syndesmotic repair performed by orthopaedic surgery had a significantly lower mean total radiation dose compared to those performed by podiatry (244.6 mRad v 565.6 mRad; p = 0.0090). Conclusion: Patients and surgical teams are exposed to significantly less radiation in isolated malleolar and trimalleolar fracture ORIF with syndesmosis repair when performed by an orthopaedic surgeon as compared to those performed by a podiatrist.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011424s00240
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure during Ankle Fracture ORIF between Orthopaedic Surgery and Podiatry

Eric Gokcen, Joshua Luginbuhl, Monica DiFiori, Kristofer Bires et al.
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Differences in Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure during Ankle Fracture ORIF between Orthopaedic Surgery and Podiatry

Eric Gokcen, Joshua Luginbuhl, Monica DiFiori, Kristofer Bires, Gaivn Rallis
article en

Abstract

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Operative ankle fractures pose a unique situation as both podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons manage these injuries. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is routinely used, however, excessive radiation can be harmful to both the patient and surgical team. The primary aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the amount of intraoperative radiation exposure during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) when performed by orthopaedic surgeons versus podiatrists. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent ankle fracture ORIF at an urban level I trauma center between January 1st, 2018 and April 1st, 2023. The electronic health record was queried using International Classification of Diseases nine and 10 codes associated with ankle fractures. Patients greater than 18 years of age with an ankle fracture managed operatively were included. Subjects were then stratified by procedure. Mean total radiation dose (mRad) and mean total fluoroscopic time (seconds) were then compared between those performed by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. Results: Of the 333 included procedures, 186 were performed by orthopaedic surgeons and 147 were performed by podiatrists. Using multiple linear regression analysis to control for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index, patients undergoing isolated malleolus ORIF with syndesmosis repair performed by orthopaedic surgery were found to have a significantly lower mean fluoroscopic time compared those performed by podiatry (68.4s versus 104.8.s; p = 0.0280). Additionally, trimalleolar ORIF with syndesmotic repair performed by orthopaedic surgery had a significantly lower mean total radiation dose compared to those performed by podiatry (244.6 mRad v 565.6 mRad; p = 0.0090). Conclusion: Patients and surgical teams are exposed to significantly less radiation in isolated malleolar and trimalleolar fracture ORIF with syndesmosis repair when performed by an orthopaedic surgeon as compared to those performed by a podiatrist.

Foot & Ankle OrthopaedicsVol. 9(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.