Wittgenstein on the “Alien Will”: A Study of Compatibilism and Divine Influence

In this article, I delve into Wittgenstein’s early manuscripts to examine the idea of an “alien will”, which may have been inspired by Schopenhauer and Weininger. By contrast with other interpretations, I treat this notion not as a metaphor but as the fundamental idea that the world is independent of an individual’s will and appears instead to be influenced by a quasi-divine, alien will. This alien will, distinct from personal will, could either coincide or conflict with an individual subject’s will, affecting their happiness. I argue that this (dis)agreement involves the modal properties of objects rather than being a matter of factual consistency. Ultimately, I position Wittgenstein’s views as a form of pre-emptive compatibilism, according to which divine will shapes human conditions without compromising free will. This contributes a significant perspective to debates in the philosophy of religion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15121567
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wittgenstein on the “Alien Will”: A Study of Compatibilism and Divine Influence

Jakub Mácha
1 citations
Religions
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
4.22
article

Wittgenstein on the “Alien Will”: A Study of Compatibilism and Divine Influence

Jakub Mácha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, I delve into Wittgenstein’s early manuscripts to examine the idea of an “alien will”, which may have been inspired by Schopenhauer and Weininger. By contrast with other interpretations, I treat this notion not as a metaphor but as the fundamental idea that the world is independent of an individual’s will and appears instead to be influenced by a quasi-divine, alien will. This alien will, distinct from personal will, could either coincide or conflict with an individual subject’s will, affecting their happiness. I argue that this (dis)agreement involves the modal properties of objects rather than being a matter of factual consistency. Ultimately, I position Wittgenstein’s views as a form of pre-emptive compatibilism, according to which divine will shapes human conditions without compromising free will. This contributes a significant perspective to debates in the philosophy of religion.

ReligionsVol. 15(12)
Masaryk University (CZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.