Is Public Health Education and Training Adequately Responding (or Not) to Emerging Priorities?

Recent work by the World Federation of Public Health Associations’ Professional Education Training (WFPHA PET) working group has identified five emerging areas (OneHealth, Systems Thinking, Public Health Ethics, Political Engagement, and Disaster and Emergency Health) within the discipline of public health that practitioners need to have a basic understanding to prepare themselves for the future of the field. However, these areas are not necessarily included in public health competency sets or curricula globally. The WFPHA PET held a fireside chat of experts to discuss the main issues faced in integrating these specialties into public health education, training, and practice. Common threads seen across the panel included: (1) The current pace of change in these areas of public health; (2) ‘Nimble’ ways of identifying emerging (wicked) problems; (3) The need for innovative ways of teaching; (4) The need for sophisticated public health-related communication systems; (5) Understanding current political imperatives. To enhance the capacity of the public health workforce, it is essential to update course materials and integrate new and innovative materials and teaching strategies while retaining core content. This is complex, but necessary to further strengthen the workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic provided us with a unique experience and opportunity to reflect on how and what we teach, with the first step to bolster public health curricula and training to address current competency gaps in emerging priority areas to strengthen the public health workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogy in Health Promotion
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799241305376
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Public Health Education and Training Adequately Responding (or Not) to Emerging Priorities?

Geri Kemper Seeley, Christina Anne Severinsen, Leanne Coombe, Priscilla Robinson
2 citations
Pedagogy in Health Promotion
Public Health Policies and Education
1.70
article

Is Public Health Education and Training Adequately Responding (or Not) to Emerging Priorities?

Geri Kemper Seeley, Christina Anne Severinsen, Leanne Coombe, Priscilla Robinson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent work by the World Federation of Public Health Associations’ Professional Education Training (WFPHA PET) working group has identified five emerging areas (OneHealth, Systems Thinking, Public Health Ethics, Political Engagement, and Disaster and Emergency Health) within the discipline of public health that practitioners need to have a basic understanding to prepare themselves for the future of the field. However, these areas are not necessarily included in public health competency sets or curricula globally. The WFPHA PET held a fireside chat of experts to discuss the main issues faced in integrating these specialties into public health education, training, and practice. Common threads seen across the panel included: (1) The current pace of change in these areas of public health; (2) ‘Nimble’ ways of identifying emerging (wicked) problems; (3) The need for innovative ways of teaching; (4) The need for sophisticated public health-related communication systems; (5) Understanding current political imperatives. To enhance the capacity of the public health workforce, it is essential to update course materials and integrate new and innovative materials and teaching strategies while retaining core content. This is complex, but necessary to further strengthen the workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic provided us with a unique experience and opportunity to reflect on how and what we teach, with the first step to bolster public health curricula and training to address current competency gaps in emerging priority areas to strengthen the public health workforce.

Pedagogy in Health PromotionVol. 11(3)
Milken Institute (US), The University of Queensland (AU), George Washington University (US), World Federation of Public Health Associations (CH), Massey University (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Public Health Policies and Education
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.