Accurate Oil and Gas Production Decline Curve Fit Using Cumulative Production-Production Rate- Time Linearized Form of Arp’s Hyperbolic Decline Equation

Production forecasting is a crucial process in the Oil and Gas Business. Arps decline curves are the most common of these forecasting tools. The Exponential, Hyperbolic and Harmonic declines originated by J.J. Arps are three main decline profile types widely used in the industry. Exponential and Harmonic curves are more common because of the ease of fitting production profiles with them. Exponential and Harmonic, which rarely occur, are special cases the general Arps Decline curve. However, hyperbolic is the principal Decline curve equation. The difficulty in hyperbolic Decline fitting is in the prediction of the second decline parameter (Decline exponent). A hyperbolic decline fit of oil and gas production using a linear form has been demonstrated earlier on, and this worked well except for the estimation of initial production rate which was obtained by data regression. This paper shows yet another linear form of hyperbolic decline using Cumulative Production, Production Rate and Time. The novel form was found to be a better representation of the hyperbolic form than even the earlier linear model if Cumulative productions, production Rate with time data is available. This model will improve remaining reserves estimation, production rate forecasting and cumulative production trending. It should be noted, at this point, that the linear form presented here only replicates the exact Arp’s hyperbolic Decline form but cannot account for the decline pattern exhibited by wells due to drastic changes in reservoir fluid or rock properties like Gas-oil-ratio, water cut, porosity, permeability and changes caused by introduction of Artificial Lift or enhanced recovery scheme. The explicit determination of Initial Production Rate, Decline Exponent and Decline Constant using this derived linear form, in this paper, is the strength of this method over and above other methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000400
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate Oil and Gas Production Decline Curve Fit Using Cumulative Production-Production Rate- Time Linearized Form of Arp’s Hyperbolic Decline Equation

N. W. M. Ko
Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
article

Accurate Oil and Gas Production Decline Curve Fit Using Cumulative Production-Production Rate- Time Linearized Form of Arp’s Hyperbolic Decline Equation

N. W. M. Ko
article en

Abstract

Production forecasting is a crucial process in the Oil and Gas Business. Arps decline curves are the most common of these forecasting tools. The Exponential, Hyperbolic and Harmonic declines originated by J.J. Arps are three main decline profile types widely used in the industry. Exponential and Harmonic curves are more common because of the ease of fitting production profiles with them. Exponential and Harmonic, which rarely occur, are special cases the general Arps Decline curve. However, hyperbolic is the principal Decline curve equation. The difficulty in hyperbolic Decline fitting is in the prediction of the second decline parameter (Decline exponent). A hyperbolic decline fit of oil and gas production using a linear form has been demonstrated earlier on, and this worked well except for the estimation of initial production rate which was obtained by data regression. This paper shows yet another linear form of hyperbolic decline using Cumulative Production, Production Rate and Time. The novel form was found to be a better representation of the hyperbolic form than even the earlier linear model if Cumulative productions, production Rate with time data is available. This model will improve remaining reserves estimation, production rate forecasting and cumulative production trending. It should be noted, at this point, that the linear form presented here only replicates the exact Arp’s hyperbolic Decline form but cannot account for the decline pattern exhibited by wells due to drastic changes in reservoir fluid or rock properties like Gas-oil-ratio, water cut, porosity, permeability and changes caused by introduction of Artificial Lift or enhanced recovery scheme. The explicit determination of Initial Production Rate, Decline Exponent and Decline Constant using this derived linear form, in this paper, is the strength of this method over and above other methods.

Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering JournalVol. 8(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.