Students’ thinking process in solving Pythagoras problems: Piaget’s theory in adversity quotient

Mathematics involves abstract concepts that require more than memorization; it demands a deep-thinking process for true understanding. This study aims to analyze and describe the thinking processes of students in solving problems related to the Pythagorean theorem, using Jean Piaget's theory in the context of Adversity Quotient (AQ). The research design is qualitative, employing a descriptive approach. The participants were 32 eighth-grade students from SMP Negeri 2 Ngawi, East Java province, Indonesia in the 2022/2023 academic year, categorized into three AQ groups: quitters, campers, and climbers. Data collection methods included the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire, think-aloud tests, and interviews. The data were analyzed following Miles and Huberman’s model, which involves data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate: (1) Quitters displayed both assimilation and accommodation in understanding and planning problem-solving strategies, but relied on assimilation during problem-solving and review; (2) Campers primarily engaged in assimilation throughout understanding, planning, solving, and reviewing; (3) Climbers used assimilation for understanding, planning, and reviewing, but employed both assimilation and accommodation during problem-solving execution. These findings suggest that students' AQ levels influence their cognitive processes in mathematics problem-solving, with higher AQ individuals demonstrating greater flexibility in their thinking. This has implications for educators seeking to tailor instructional approaches to students' adversity responses, enhancing both cognitive development and resilience in learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN)
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i2.9692
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ thinking process in solving Pythagoras problems: Piaget’s theory in adversity quotient

Laila Fitriana, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadı, Saskia Rizkiana Putri
1 citations
Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN)
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
0.97
article

Students’ thinking process in solving Pythagoras problems: Piaget’s theory in adversity quotient

Laila Fitriana, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadı, Saskia Rizkiana Putri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mathematics involves abstract concepts that require more than memorization; it demands a deep-thinking process for true understanding. This study aims to analyze and describe the thinking processes of students in solving problems related to the Pythagorean theorem, using Jean Piaget's theory in the context of Adversity Quotient (AQ). The research design is qualitative, employing a descriptive approach. The participants were 32 eighth-grade students from SMP Negeri 2 Ngawi, East Java province, Indonesia in the 2022/2023 academic year, categorized into three AQ groups: quitters, campers, and climbers. Data collection methods included the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire, think-aloud tests, and interviews. The data were analyzed following Miles and Huberman’s model, which involves data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate: (1) Quitters displayed both assimilation and accommodation in understanding and planning problem-solving strategies, but relied on assimilation during problem-solving and review; (2) Campers primarily engaged in assimilation throughout understanding, planning, solving, and reviewing; (3) Climbers used assimilation for understanding, planning, and reviewing, but employed both assimilation and accommodation during problem-solving execution. These findings suggest that students' AQ levels influence their cognitive processes in mathematics problem-solving, with higher AQ individuals demonstrating greater flexibility in their thinking. This has implications for educators seeking to tailor instructional approaches to students' adversity responses, enhancing both cognitive development and resilience in learning.

Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN)Vol. 4(2)
Sebelas Maret University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
0.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Students’ thinking process in solving Pythagoras problems: Piaget’s theory in adversity quotient — Laila Fitriana, Tri Atmojo Kusmayadı, et al. · Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS