Moving the logic of sustainability towards flourishing‐for‐all

Abstract Flourishing‐for‐all as emerged as a concept to respond to the apparent lack of capacity to translate the sustainability discourse into actual practices conducive to more sustainable societies. In this special issue, we assert that flourishing‐for‐all addresses the gap identified in the sustainability discourse that still needs conversion into practice, and that processes for catalyzing this necessary transformation need to be identified and implemented. The eight papers in this special issue address flourishing‐for‐all from different ontological, epistemological, and methodological perspectives, demonstrating a wide interest in the topic, and the shared belief that both academia and practice must go beyond sustainability to embrace flourishing‐for‐all. They bring to the fore three important features of a flourishing‐for‐all approach: First, it allows for a more profound analysis of systemic sustainability‐related problems; secondly, it highlights new relationships among the problem‐related variables; thirdly, it extends the repertory and reach of possible solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business and Society Review
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12376
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving the logic of sustainability towards flourishing‐for‐all

Sandra Waddock, Nuno Guimarães da Costa, Géraldine Schmidt, Klaus‐Peter Schulz
2 citations
Business and Society Review
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.98
article

Moving the logic of sustainability towards flourishing‐for‐all

Sandra Waddock, Nuno Guimarães da Costa, Géraldine Schmidt, Klaus‐Peter Schulz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Flourishing‐for‐all as emerged as a concept to respond to the apparent lack of capacity to translate the sustainability discourse into actual practices conducive to more sustainable societies. In this special issue, we assert that flourishing‐for‐all addresses the gap identified in the sustainability discourse that still needs conversion into practice, and that processes for catalyzing this necessary transformation need to be identified and implemented. The eight papers in this special issue address flourishing‐for‐all from different ontological, epistemological, and methodological perspectives, demonstrating a wide interest in the topic, and the shared belief that both academia and practice must go beyond sustainability to embrace flourishing‐for‐all. They bring to the fore three important features of a flourishing‐for‐all approach: First, it allows for a more profound analysis of systemic sustainability‐related problems; secondly, it highlights new relationships among the problem‐related variables; thirdly, it extends the repertory and reach of possible solutions.

Business and Society ReviewVol. 130(S1)
Boston College (US), Excelia Business School (FR), Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.