Identifying the vulnerable: Concepts and measurement

Abstract Vulnerability to poverty, which broadly captures the susceptibility to becoming poor in the future, has become an integral part of any deprivation assessment. In this paper, we provide axiomatic foundations to much of the empirical literature on vulnerability measurement, which often relies on ad hoc rules to identify the vulnerable. Recognizing the formidable informational challenges in vulnerability measurement, we propose and axiomatically characterize a class of identification rules based on the future probability of falling into poverty. Additionally, we axiomatically characterize the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke class of vulnerability measures for those who are identified as vulnerable. Using this framework, we construct the societal vulnerability measure and demonstrate that societal vulnerability can be decomposed into vulnerabilities arising from the different shocks. Finally, we provide an empirical illustration of the identification and measurement rules proposed in this paper using real‐world data from Bangladesh.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12722
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying the vulnerable: Concepts and measurement

Shasi Nandeibam, Ajit Mishra, James Foster, Indranil Dutta
Review of Income and Wealth
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Identifying the vulnerable: Concepts and measurement

Shasi Nandeibam, Ajit Mishra, James Foster, Indranil Dutta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Vulnerability to poverty, which broadly captures the susceptibility to becoming poor in the future, has become an integral part of any deprivation assessment. In this paper, we provide axiomatic foundations to much of the empirical literature on vulnerability measurement, which often relies on ad hoc rules to identify the vulnerable. Recognizing the formidable informational challenges in vulnerability measurement, we propose and axiomatically characterize a class of identification rules based on the future probability of falling into poverty. Additionally, we axiomatically characterize the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke class of vulnerability measures for those who are identified as vulnerable. Using this framework, we construct the societal vulnerability measure and demonstrate that societal vulnerability can be decomposed into vulnerabilities arising from the different shocks. Finally, we provide an empirical illustration of the identification and measurement rules proposed in this paper using real‐world data from Bangladesh.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(1)
George Washington University (US), University of Manchester (GB), University of Bath (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.