Non-Destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Magnetic Flux Leakage and Eddy Current Methods—Comparative Analysis

This article evaluates two essential non-destructive electromagnetic techniques, magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and eddy current (EC) methods, and their effectiveness in assessing the basic parameters of reinforced concrete (RC). The study compares both systems’ hardware and software components, emphasizing the adaptations implemented to tailor the methods for evaluating RC structures. Subsequently, the measurement results are analyzed, and association rules are extracted to demonstrate the relationships between variations in the physical parameters of the tested structure and the features of the measured waveforms. Finally, similar identification models are implemented, and the obtained identification results are compared. The paper documents and details all phases of this research. The findings indicate that while the operational principles of both methods are similar, the techniques differ significantly in terms of their measurement systems’ complexity and usability. The eddy current (EC) method exhibits superior spatial resolution, whereas the magnetic method is more straightforward and offers a greater effective range and favorable association rules. Consequently, it is recommended that both techniques be utilized for different structures and in varying contexts. The techniques’ advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are discussed in this work and supported by the measurement results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411965
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Magnetic Flux Leakage and Eddy Current Methods—Comparative Analysis

Paweł Karol Frankowski, Tomasz Stawicki, M. Mąka, P. Majzner
11 citations
Applied Sciences
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
2.34
article

Non-Destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Magnetic Flux Leakage and Eddy Current Methods—Comparative Analysis

Paweł Karol Frankowski, Tomasz Stawicki, M. Mąka, P. Majzner
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This article evaluates two essential non-destructive electromagnetic techniques, magnetic flux leakage (MFL) and eddy current (EC) methods, and their effectiveness in assessing the basic parameters of reinforced concrete (RC). The study compares both systems’ hardware and software components, emphasizing the adaptations implemented to tailor the methods for evaluating RC structures. Subsequently, the measurement results are analyzed, and association rules are extracted to demonstrate the relationships between variations in the physical parameters of the tested structure and the features of the measured waveforms. Finally, similar identification models are implemented, and the obtained identification results are compared. The paper documents and details all phases of this research. The findings indicate that while the operational principles of both methods are similar, the techniques differ significantly in terms of their measurement systems’ complexity and usability. The eddy current (EC) method exhibits superior spatial resolution, whereas the magnetic method is more straightforward and offers a greater effective range and favorable association rules. Consequently, it is recommended that both techniques be utilized for different structures and in varying contexts. The techniques’ advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are discussed in this work and supported by the measurement results.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL), Maritime University of Szczecin (PL)
Narodowym Centrum Nauki
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.