Validity of the Enode Sensor and My Jump 3 App for Assessing Countermovement Jump Performance

Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance analysis is vital in sports science for assessing lower-body strength and neuromuscular efficiency. This study evaluated the validity of the Enode Sensor and My Jump 3 App for measuring vertical jump heights, comparing them to those measured using the established Force Plate. Twenty-nine participants performed CMJs measured using each device. Descriptive statistics indicated mean jump heights of 48.4 ± 4.18 cm (for the Enode Sensor), 47.3 ± 4.05 cm (for My Jump 3), and 46.1 ± 4.03 cm (for the Force Plate). Reliability was confirmed via Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), with the Enode Sensor at 0.914 and My Jump 3 at 0.968, demonstrating excellent reliability. Bland–Altman analysis showed mean biases of 2.281 cm (for the Enode Sensor) and 1.297 cm (for My Jump 3) against the Force Plate, with limits of agreement suggesting close alignment. Strong positive correlations were observed (for the Enode Sensor, r = 0.972 and for My Jump 3, r = 0.987; p < 0.001), and linear regression analysis produced R2 values of 0.945 and 0.973, respectively, confirming both tools’ accuracy for vertical jump measurement. These findings indicate that although both tools are suitable for CMJ assessment, My Jump 3 demonstrated slightly superior accuracy, underscoring the potential for accessible, reliable performance monitoring in sports contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411989
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of the Enode Sensor and My Jump 3 App for Assessing Countermovement Jump Performance

Athanasios Mandroukas, Andreas Stafylidis, Davor Puljić, Christos Karavas
10 citations
Applied Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
4.78
article

Validity of the Enode Sensor and My Jump 3 App for Assessing Countermovement Jump Performance

Athanasios Mandroukas, Andreas Stafylidis, Davor Puljić, Christos Karavas
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Countermovement jump (CMJ) performance analysis is vital in sports science for assessing lower-body strength and neuromuscular efficiency. This study evaluated the validity of the Enode Sensor and My Jump 3 App for measuring vertical jump heights, comparing them to those measured using the established Force Plate. Twenty-nine participants performed CMJs measured using each device. Descriptive statistics indicated mean jump heights of 48.4 ± 4.18 cm (for the Enode Sensor), 47.3 ± 4.05 cm (for My Jump 3), and 46.1 ± 4.03 cm (for the Force Plate). Reliability was confirmed via Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), with the Enode Sensor at 0.914 and My Jump 3 at 0.968, demonstrating excellent reliability. Bland–Altman analysis showed mean biases of 2.281 cm (for the Enode Sensor) and 1.297 cm (for My Jump 3) against the Force Plate, with limits of agreement suggesting close alignment. Strong positive correlations were observed (for the Enode Sensor, r = 0.972 and for My Jump 3, r = 0.987; p < 0.001), and linear regression analysis produced R2 values of 0.945 and 0.973, respectively, confirming both tools’ accuracy for vertical jump measurement. These findings indicate that although both tools are suitable for CMJ assessment, My Jump 3 demonstrated slightly superior accuracy, underscoring the potential for accessible, reliable performance monitoring in sports contexts.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(24)
University of Wolverhampton (GB), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sports Performance and Training
4.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.