Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence

Using a new latent measure of cultural affinity in military alliances (1816–2011), this study shows that states are less likely to be targets of militarized disputes or wars if they are members of defensive alliances with more culturally similar states. The theory posits that alliances between culturally similar states are designed with rules and norms that reflect the community’s shared interests, which helps the members handle intra-alliance conflicts, and strengthens the overall credibility of the agreements, deterring attacks on outside members. Empirical analyses of politically relevant dyads with alliance ties shows that cultural affinity provides deterrence benefits in alliances between democracies (e.g., NATO) or between autocracies (e.g., Arab League, Gulf Cooperation Council) and that the deterrence results are strongest for potential targets that are non-democratic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Interactions
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2024.2441664
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, S. Y. Lee, Addison Huygens
International Interactions
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, S. Y. Lee, Addison Huygens
article en

Abstract

Using a new latent measure of cultural affinity in military alliances (1816–2011), this study shows that states are less likely to be targets of militarized disputes or wars if they are members of defensive alliances with more culturally similar states. The theory posits that alliances between culturally similar states are designed with rules and norms that reflect the community’s shared interests, which helps the members handle intra-alliance conflicts, and strengthens the overall credibility of the agreements, deterring attacks on outside members. Empirical analyses of politically relevant dyads with alliance ties shows that cultural affinity provides deterrence benefits in alliances between democracies (e.g., NATO) or between autocracies (e.g., Arab League, Gulf Cooperation Council) and that the deterrence results are strongest for potential targets that are non-democratic.

International InteractionsVol. 51(1)
University of Iowa (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do birds of a feather deter better? Cultural affinity and alliance deterrence — Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, S. Y. Lee, et al. · International Interactions (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS